Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Pak General was happy with my aim, says Kasab

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • KasabSmall
    Outside Arthur Road Jail where the trial began.
    The 26/11 attack was part of a grand conspiracy by the Lashkar-e-Toiba to target major Indian cities, weaken India’s economy and eventually try and snatch Kashmir, Ajmal Amir Kasab said in his confession. He also said that the 10 gunmen who raided Mumbai were trained by Pakistan army officers, and that they were told to specifically target foreigners in order to damage India’s ties with those countries.

    Portions of Kasab’s confessions, recorded before a magistrate on February 17 when he was in police custody, were read out by special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam as the trial began in a courtroom inside Mumbai’s Arthur Road prison today.

    SG Abbas Kazmi, Kasab’s lawyer, filed an application seeking to retract the confession, saying it had been extracted from Kasab under “duress”. Kazmi also argued that his client was under 18 years of age, and the court, therefore, had no jurisdiction over his trial. “He is still under 18. In such circumstances he is deemed to be a juvenile and this court has no jurisdiction to try this case,” Kazmi said.

    Ads by Google

    Judge ML Tahilyani allowed the application for retraction, but rejected the contention that Kasab was not an adult. “In my considered opinion, the plea is frivolous and intended to delay the trial,” he said after inspecting Kasab in the dock. Nikam argued that Kasab had, both in his confession statement to police and on transfer to jail, said he was 21. “On the day of the incident, November 26, 2008, he had completed 21 years, two months and some 13 days,” Nikam said.

    “The attackers were the product of a terror culture which has penetrated, has firm roots and is well established in Pakistan. The attackers were so well acquainted and well equipped with arms and ammunition that this is not possible without proper training from army officials,” Nikam told the court.

    He said a Pakistani army officer, Col R Sadatulla, who is wanted in the case, had accessed an e-mail ID used by the masterminds of the attack to set up a connection with a telecom server through which the attackers and their handlers in Pakistan communicated. These facts clearly indicate the Pakistani establishment’s involvement, Nikam added.

    Nikam read Kasab’s confession about an unnamed Pakistani Major General having supervised the training of the 10 attackers.

    “Abu Hafiz Saeed said, ‘Now it is time to do jihad. We have to decide how to attack Hindustan.’ After that Zaki-ur-Rehman said, ‘India’s financial stronghold is Mumbai so it is important to attack Mumbai. All you mujahideen have acquired good sea training. We will attack Mumbai using the sea route. At that time Major General sahab came,” Nikam read.

    “He hugged Amir Hafiz Saeed and Zaki-ur-Rehman and they went further away and he was talking to them. After some time, he came to us and Zaki-ur-Rehman said that Major General sahab would like to see our preparation. Immediately we were given one kalshan (Kalashnikov) each with a full magazine. Major General sahab told Amir Hafiz Saeed to put targets. Amir Hafiz Saeed asked Abu Kahfa to put 10 targets,” the confession said.

    Hafiz Saeed is the head of the Jamaat ud-Dawa, the Lashkar’s parent organisation, and Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi is the Lashkar’s operations chief. Abu Kahfa is a top Lashkar operative.

    “Major General said, ‘When I say fire once, fire one shot and when I say fire twice do rapid fire.’ Ten of us took positions and he inspected our positions and then said ‘fire’. We immediately fired a single shot. Except for Imran Babar everyone fired on target. Amir Hafiz Saeed scolded Imran and used abusive words. Major General asked Imran to do target practice. Again we were asked to take positions and we did so. Major General said ‘fire twice’ and we emptied the magazines. Major General then checked the targets closely and said, ‘Who fired target 4?’ I said, ‘I did.’ He said you have completely destroyed target 4. I am very happy.’ He told the others, ‘You have to destroy more using less number of bullets.’ He pointed towards me and said, ‘Your firing should be like this mujahideen’s and he left.”

    According to Kasab’s statement, Hafiz Saeed told them: “All jihadis have to fight to free Kashmir. The Jamat-ud-Dawa has been fighting for 15 years in Kashmir but the Indian government is not letting go of it. So now, we have to wage a war against the Indian government to get Kashmir.”

    Abu Al-Qama, another Lashkar leader wanted in the case, told the 10 attackers that major Indian cities must be targeted to break them from within. “Jo is kaam mein shahid hoga usko jannat naseeb hoga”. (Whoever dies in this endeavour, will go to heaven.)

    The attackers were instructed to target foreign nationals, especially Israelis, who they were told had caused maximum damage to Muslims worldwide. They were told not to kill Muslims at the Taj, Oberoi, Nariman House and Colaba. However, at CST, where there would both Hindus and Muslims, they must carry out “brush fire”.

    “Hotel jalaa ke bada nuksaan karne ko kaha. Hotel Oberoi ke bahar RDX se blast karne ko kaha, taaki wahaan traffic jam ho jaye aur securitywale aa na sakein.” (We were told to set hotels on fire, and use RDX to set off an explosion outside Oberoi, so that securitymen could not come in.)

    Time to teach our beloved neighbours a lesson that they will remember till QayamatBy: arjun | 19-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Hang the sonofabitch without delay
    Defense layer for KasabBy: Chandulal S Vithlani | 19-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward It is a primary responsiblity of a lawyer to side for truth and not to spread lies. How did he came to conclusion that the criminal is under 18? Even if he is under 18 so what? He is a bloody terrosist who has killed may innocent persons. I think Indian govenrment is unnecessarily speding money and time for this case. If a judge can not decide whether Kasab is guilty or not whether he is terrosist or not in face of such a coverage and confession in front of a magistrate then there is something seriouly wrong with judiciary procedure. Such type of unnessary procedural insistnace (by ignoring the open facts) we have such a large of number of case pedning in the courts.CS Vithlani
    Slumdog Millionaire: Who made Salim a terrorist?By: adilkapatut | 19-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Even a hard core convict who has been given death sentence by hanging, has his human rights until the minute he is hanged, he is given medical attention, provision of food and so on. So let us forget about the names of the lawyers and their religion and allow the court to proceed and go to the bottom of the circumstances that were responsible for this unacceptable tragedy, no matter where it takes place. Kasab is 100% evil, no doubt about it but he has been a victim of circumstances as Salim is in the movie " Slumdog Millionaire". We have to address also the causes that made Salim a terrorist and only then we can solve the problem of the dispute between India and Pakistan.
    defense lawyerBy: Guru Bhai | 18-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward IN India we still have democracy. We have so called judiciary. In India we still have rights of the defendant. So unlike Pakistan defending lawyer is doing his job the way the system is. It is upto the judge to decide the merits of the case. So there is no need to accuse the defense attorney instead be proud that India is not a third world country we still have traces of judiciary left. (Ms sonia is trying her level best to use devide and rule politics which will in turn convert India into a jihadi/vatican state). Unfortunately or fortunately Kasab is innocent until proved otherwise. Until than I hope prosecutor remains strong. Please all readers GO VOTE AND KEEP DEMOCRACY ALIVE.
    Hang till dateBy: pramod | 18-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Hang till date to Kasab in Kolhapur
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.