You are here: IE »   Story

Pak provides fresh proof of Lashkar involvement in 26/11

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    Pakistan investigation agencies have, for the very first time, revealed that they have adequate proof that the banned Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT ) is directly involved in the 26/11 terror attack. A Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) report handed over to India says the material recovered from LeT camps in Karachi and Thatta indicates that the terrorists received training and weapons. “The investigation has established beyond any reasonable doubt that the defunct LeT activists conspired, abetted, planned, financed and established communication network to carry out terror attacks in Mumbai,” the report states.

    Officials said they have also recovered handwritten diaries, training manuals, Indian maps and operational instructions from Lashkar camps. “The accused were running training camps for terrorists, providing sea and navigational training, conducting intelligence courses and directions for terrorist attack,” the report said.

    Ads by Google

    It discloses that training sessions for the attackers was codenamed ‘Azizabad’ (Azizabad is one of the neighbourhoods of Gulberg Town in Karachi). The investigators seized militant literature, inflatable lifeboats, detailed maps of the Indian coastline, handwritten literature on navigational training and an intelligence course manual.

    LeT's involvement in 26/11, Pakistan By: George Thakur | 30-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward After Bombay educated Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, a UCSF Berkeley Campus Graduate lawyer, who publicly rated India, Hinduism in particular, a bigger threat to Pakistan than China's Communism, Pakistan's admission of Lashkar-e-Toiba's unquestioned involvement in 26/11 is heartening, a positive step into right direction. Magnanimous India must reciprocate equally munificently.
    Can Pak be trusted?By: RJ Khurana | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward What is Pakistan up to? Its moves on the political chessboard vis-a-vis India are awfully puzzling.A day before, Pak Interior Minister, Malik Rehman said that they had no proof, whatsoever, against LeT chief Hafiz Saeed's involvement in the 26/11 attack. A day after, a Pak spokesman says that they have all the proofs against LeT involvement in 26/11 and have found comprehensive incriminating material during their searches in Karachi and elsewhere. Pakistan is playing games. It is not sincere. It may be fighting Taliban because of US pressure as the US holds the purse strings and Pakistan can survive only on its largesse. But as regards India, Pakistan still has extremely adversarial relationship.It continues to nurture terrorists to keep India wobbly. There is no change in its "wrest Kashmir" policy.Look at the way Pakistan is making use of "Balochistan" in the Sharm-el-Sheikh joint communique.
    Pakistan's ApprochBy: Fasmin Odakkal | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward did Pakistan change their mind? From the past experience we can't beleive that they are doing something on right direction against terror. It may be, they suspect that Ajmal kasab had revealed everthing to India so keep a good face in front the media is better. However, they admitted the thruth it it is a positive sign.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.