Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Pak's claim on Taliban casualties 'wildly exaggerated'

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Pakistan army
    US military and intelligence officials have expressed scepticism about Pakistani claims of high Taliban casualties.

    Pakistan's claim that over 700 militants have been killed in the offensive against Taliban in the country's troubled northwest is being questioned by US military and intelligence officials, who termed it as "wildly exaggerated".

    Pakistani military and civil officials, including Interior Minister Rehman Malik, have said that more than 700 militants have been killed since security forces launched operations against militants in various parts of the restive Malakand area, where the Taliban's influence increased in the wake of a peace deal between them and authorities in Swat.

    However, US military and intelligence officials have expressed scepticism about Pakistani claims of high Taliban casualties, according to 'The Long War Journal', a highly regarded website that tracks the activities of the Taliban, al-Qaeda and other terror groups.

    The Pakistani military's daily reports of hundreds of Taliban fighters killed in the districts of Buner, Dir, Shangla and Swat are "wildly exaggerated", a senior US intelligence official closely watching the operations in Pakistan was quoted as saying.

    Ads by Google

    "Malik's numbers are even more fantastic than those given by the Pakistani military... Clearly (the Pakistani security establishment) want us to believe they're having fantastic success against the Taliban," a US intelligence official said.

    A US military intelligence official told the website that the "numbers issued by the (Pakistani) military are wildly exaggerated."

    The official noted that Pakistan military is over-relying on air and artillery strikes instead of engaging the Taliban. "This is like a bad movie we've all seen before. Pakistani military levels large areas, claims success, and thinks we'll be conned into believing it if they pump up the Taliban body counts," the unnamed official was quoted as saying.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Pakistan bashingBy: future legend | 21-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Before doubting pakistan's sincerity in war on terror, everyone should keep in mind that pak has suffered the most.It has lost around 1500 soldiers and has suffered a loss of more than 30 billion dollar and secondly we are fighting this war for our own good.so you people need not guide us that what should we do.Our army,isi is fully capable of fighting these foriegn funded elements and by the grace of Allah almighty we have been successfull uptill now.What the hell you people are talking about the aid, It's just 1.5 billion dollars while usa is giving 30 billion dollars to afghanistan.Why Iam saying these are foriegn funded elements because everyday american, russian, israeli and indian weapons are recovered from them and the bloody aim is to denuclearise the only islamic nuclear power.The original taliban are only afghans fighting NATO forces.2ndly this terrorism is result of west's support to mujahideen during soviet invasion, injustice to the muslims in kashmir,iraq,afghnistan etc.
    Pak's claim on Taliban casualties 'wildly exaggerated'By: Ratan Gupta | 14-May-2009 Reply | Forward Suhaaz, nothing is free. America is giving aid not for free. Why don't you ask yourself that why America and West needs Pakistan? By the way, sitting in Saudi Arabia, have you ever thought that we have 700 million people living at below poverty line? Shame on that. That is the most uncivilized thing. The number one country in the world that has sacrificied most in the so called war on terror is Pakistan, and yet you are still not happy. Come and save our 100 thousand Hindu Sisters who are burnt alive for not bring dowry every year. Come on here. This is uncivilized. What do you know the meaning of civilization. You people just talk. What did you do for human civilization by the way. A recent report has compared to India's poverty that to only sub-Saharan Africa. Shame.
    Saudi By: Suhaas Paradkar | 14-May-2009 Reply | Forward It's a shame really that USA continues to give aid to a country, that is a curse for the entire civilized world
    Oh ! u lick so nice - zardu to obamaBy: Pramod K Kulkarni | 14-May-2009 Reply | Forward Hero Vaz has said it right. Obama gets pleasure in falsely patting (licking if u want to say it this way) Zardu for his courageous statements day in n day out.Who are they tring to fool and for what purpose - no body knows. We can be certain of only two things happening which no one will dispute. (1) US Tax Payers money is vulgarly abused, wasted and aiding militants and (2) Taliban is getting richer; Obama getting fooler by the day
    Well knownBy: chanakya | 14-May-2009 Reply | Forward I think we need not strain our selves. World knows well as to what is Pakistan and what it is capable. If they pretend as if they were ignorant, then definitely they are taking us for a ride. Just as US govt finds Taliban as a creation of some enemy forces.Pakistan knows the weakness of the west and has been succesfully using it for its advantage. Only issue is the advantage has been only for the people in power or for the army, and not for the common population. That is where one gets worried whether Pakistan becomes another Somalia. Other wise as neighbours we least interested as to how many citizens were killed by the DEMOCRATICALLY elected govt. One thing is clear terror sponsorers have become active in conducting refuge camps and donation collections as usual.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.