Paranoid at Home
Related
Top Stories
- BCCI says it can't control bookies, promises to 'fix' guilty players
- Counter-terrorism to top Indo-US Security dialogue agenda: Sushilkumar Shinde
- IPL 2013 LIVE SCORE: Pune Warriors bat, Ashok Dinda back
- Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrives today, PM to seek early revival of border talks
- Telangana very much part of UPA national agenda: P C Chacko
Funding from overseas is a form of foreign investment. Though non-commercial, it enables initiatives in development and research that can have profound commercial implications, apart from serving the public purpose in less quantifiable ways. There is no denying that a number of beneficiaries of such funds have not served the public interest, have stymied development and even sponsored sectarian and terrorist sentiment. But the government can easily identify and discourage such organisations on the basis of intelligence that it already has. Similarly, the ministry should be able to distinguish between questionable sources of funds and valid funding agencies like the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and DFID, which have an identifiable track record and are transparently audited in their home countries. The present manner of debarring organisations indiscriminately has the effect of projecting the home ministry as a throwback to the socialist era, a gatekeeper standing in the way of the foreign hand proffering a wad of presumably corrupting greenbacks. Minister of State for Home Affairs Mullapally Ramachandran told this paper, in ostensible justification for including PRS Legislative Research in its list: "We do not need foreign money to educate our MPs".
Loss of FCRA registration does not completely debar organisations from receiving funds. However, it adds substantially to the mountain of paper that funding activities already generate. Apart from the headache, this increases project administrative costs, reducing the portion of funds available for application to the final beneficiaries. In other words, money allocated for doing good is diverted to compliance. Funding agencies rarely complain about the difficulties of working in India for fear of a backlash from the home ministry. They don't have to complain. Absurdities like cancelling the FCRA registration of institutions of national importance make it abundantly clear that something is wrong.
Please read our terms of use before posting commentsEditors’ Pick
- Quake-hit and shaken, Bhaderwah spends nights in the open
- UP blast accused dies on way to jail, govt wanted to drop case against him
- Former civil aviation secy changes mind, seeks airport security exemption as EC
- BCCI suspects Gujarat players in other teams were also approached
- Police on money trail, Sreesanth in fresh trouble
- Chhattisgarh 'encounter' leaves 8 villagers dead, no Maoist link yet
- Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrives today, PM to seek early revival of border talks


Not so fast
Power for the people
Iran elections: Khamenei versus Ahmadinejad
A welcome end




















