Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Parliament attack case: SC dismisses Shaukat’s plea

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a writ petition filed by Shaukat Hussain Guru, the convict in the Parliament attack case, challenging his 10-year imprisonment under Section 123-A of the IPC (withholding information of criminal conspiracy from police).

    “In the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any ground to entertain the petition under Article 32 of the Constitution,” the Bench comprising Justices P P Naolekar and V S Sirpurkar said, upholding the earlier three decisions of the apex court, wherein his conviction and sentence under Section 123 of the IPC was maintained.

    The court found it impermissible to grant him relief after he exhausted all the legal recourses available — challenging the High Court judgment, first the appeal, then review and finally a curative petition.

    Shaukat was awarded the death sentence by a trial court which was upheld by the Delhi High Court. The apex court, however, reduced the sentence to 10-year rigorous imprisonment by absolving him of the charges of criminal conspiracy. His review petition and curative petition have already been dismissed by the SC.

    Ads by Google

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.