Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Pathak: Father, son abused position, Cong in the clear

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The CPM and CPI, which support the UPA coalition, declined immediate comment, saying they would do so after “studying the report”.

    The report, which dwelt less on the Congress, has given extensive “evidence” on the Singhs, Andaleeb and Khanna. Senior counel T R Andhiyarijuna and Raju Ramachandran who acted as the “commission’s counsel” said: “We led with the evidence from various sources obtained by the commission”.

    Sources said: “the telephone conversation transcript between Andaleeb and Khanna were also submitted as evidence”. Andaleeb and Khanna, sources said, were in regular touch with “two persons” in the Middle East, one an Indian and the other from “that region”. The “money link” could be traced only to “these two persons” as of now, they pointed out.

    What Volcker said

    Volcker named Natwar and Congress as “non-contractual beneficiaries’’ of Iraqi oil sales in 2001

    Ads by Google

    According to Volcker, Natwar was in category of individuals who either sold or gave their rights to buy oil from Saddam’s Iraq to oil companies. In his case, it was allegedly to Switzerland-based Masefield AG

    Natwar, Volcker said, had rights for four million barrels of oil, of which 1.9 million barrels were lifted by Masefield. The Congress also allegedly had rights for four million barrels. Only one million barrels were lifted in one go, again by Masefield AG, said Volcker

    Previous12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.