Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Pay parity for armed forces a difficult task: Govt

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Armed forces
    The Govt has said it is 'very difficult' to maintain a balance in salaries of govt servants doing varied jobs.

    With the armed forces insisting on a pay hike, the government has said it is "very difficult" to maintain a balance in salaries of government servants doing varied jobs.

    "It is a very difficult exercise. Because it is not just a question of ensuring that people get better salaries. It is also a question of parities.... balances," Cabinet Secretary K M Chandrasekhar said in an interview.

    He was responding to a question on what steps the government was contemplating in view of the armed forces' demand for pay parity.

    Chandrasekhar said issues become more complicated when people start feeling that they are being discriminated against by the Pay Commission recommendations.

    "It is very difficult when people feel that this chap has got more than me...that feeling is there. So, to maintain that kind of balance.... it is very difficult," he said.

    Ads by Google

    The Cabinet Secretary said the ministerial committee headed by External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee, who had held both Defence and Finance portfolios earlier, was working on to find out a solution to the demands of the defence forces.

    The armed forces have recently strongly conveyed to the government that there should be "no dilution" on their demands for pay parity.

    This comes in the wake of reports that the government was trying to find a "middle path" to break the deadlock over the armed forces' demands that included placing Army Lieutenant Colonels and their equivalents in the Navy and Air Force in Pay Band-4.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    pay hike for armed forcesBy: ram | 23-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward The civil administration(read our bureaucrats/ police friends) are inept at handling any situation,be it floods, famine, tsunami, even pulling out kids from wells! They want the armed forces for every thing. Even after 26/11, if the core issues are not addressed, god save this country
    6PCBy: Dugs | 15-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward I bet he did a pretty good "job" for his bureaucrat and police friends
    goog jobBy: mohan | 06-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Pretty Good job Mr. Cabinet secretary eh? This time I wish there was a rep from the defense who could have blown the whistle on you bunch. I wish the babus keep their hands away from defense and allow them to decide their priorities, at work and other things. Then there is hope for this great nation.
    work culture vs payBy: triveni | 04-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Many views have been expressed on PB-4 for LT COL when all in pay of 14300/-are in PB-4. Why do not the country realise the cutting edge of army have to kept sharp. You saw Bombay Blast and now wanting to spend thousands of crores. we have every thing intelligence,police,civil administration all sitting with PB -4 and throwing mud at each other. Check their charter of duties, see the feild work, check their legal acts and copare all this with the genuine demand of LT COLs. It they who are team leaders,who excute,who move with their jawans. Yet you do not want to put them in PB-4 when all others with 14300/- have been given. Lets do some justice.
    pay parity defenceBy: monica | 25-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Can the IE send these messages to the subject please. And does he realise that behind the polemic there are deep truths about upholding the nations's interests that the IAS is presumably also sworn to. And pse dont ignore this as something merely from the urban and the urbane. The rural electorate thinks the same way. The forces collectively have on many occasions done their job as trustees of the nation. When will it be the collective turn of the exalted civil service. Or are we taking globalisation too literally.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.