Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Pay parity for armed forces a difficult task: Govt

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Armed forces
    The Govt has said it is 'very difficult' to maintain a balance in salaries of govt servants doing varied jobs.

    The Cabinet Secretary said when the armed forces raised the issue of pay parity, the Committee of Secretaries took up it immediately and deliberated on how to find a solution to it for the satisfaction of the defence personnel.

    "When the armed forces raised the issue, we sat together at the official level with Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister (P M Nair) and decided that the best thing would be to request the higher level.

    "So we requested the External Affairs Minister because he was both Defence and Finance Minister earlier and could consult Defence Minister and Finance Minister and give his views," he said.

    Chandrasekhar said a "large majority" of government officials, including the Group C and Group D employees, accepted the Pay Commission recommendations and were "more or less satisfied".

    "I do not have too many complaints and whatever complaints are there, we have created a mechanism. We got the anomaly committee, we got a fast track committee to look into those issues," he said.

    Ads by Google

    Highlighting the difficult task carried out by the 6th Pay Commission while framing the recommendations, Chandrasekhar said they had to make a huge change in the structure.

    "See normally we used to get pay scales. Here we have gone away from pay scales to the Pay Band structure, which is entirely different structure. So, to maintain the parity was pretty difficult. But still I think we did a pretty good job," he said.

    Previous12
    pay hike for armed forcesBy: ram | 23-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward The civil administration(read our bureaucrats/ police friends) are inept at handling any situation,be it floods, famine, tsunami, even pulling out kids from wells! They want the armed forces for every thing. Even after 26/11, if the core issues are not addressed, god save this country
    6PCBy: Dugs | 15-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward I bet he did a pretty good "job" for his bureaucrat and police friends
    goog jobBy: mohan | 06-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Pretty Good job Mr. Cabinet secretary eh? This time I wish there was a rep from the defense who could have blown the whistle on you bunch. I wish the babus keep their hands away from defense and allow them to decide their priorities, at work and other things. Then there is hope for this great nation.
    work culture vs payBy: triveni | 04-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Many views have been expressed on PB-4 for LT COL when all in pay of 14300/-are in PB-4. Why do not the country realise the cutting edge of army have to kept sharp. You saw Bombay Blast and now wanting to spend thousands of crores. we have every thing intelligence,police,civil administration all sitting with PB -4 and throwing mud at each other. Check their charter of duties, see the feild work, check their legal acts and copare all this with the genuine demand of LT COLs. It they who are team leaders,who excute,who move with their jawans. Yet you do not want to put them in PB-4 when all others with 14300/- have been given. Lets do some justice.
    pay parity defenceBy: monica | 25-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Can the IE send these messages to the subject please. And does he realise that behind the polemic there are deep truths about upholding the nations's interests that the IAS is presumably also sworn to. And pse dont ignore this as something merely from the urban and the urbane. The rural electorate thinks the same way. The forces collectively have on many occasions done their job as trustees of the nation. When will it be the collective turn of the exalted civil service. Or are we taking globalisation too literally.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.