Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

PC says he wasn’t aware of resolution

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Under attack from the BJP, Union Home Minister P Chidambaram said on Wednesday that the Jamiat-Ulema-e-Hind resolution which asked Muslims not to sing the Vande Mataram was not passed in his presence and he was not aware of it.

    A day after the BJP criticised him for attending the Jamiat conclave in Deoband and argued that his presence there had legitimised the resolution, Chidambaram’s office issued a statement rejecting the charges. It said no resolution was passed when he was present at the conference.

    However, the BJP continued to target him, seeking an apology, and the Shiv Sena joined in, saying those opposed to the song should go to Pakistan or Bangladesh.

    Asked about its reaction, the Congress said the matter was sensitive, involving religious sentiments, and no controversy should be raked up over it. “It is our national song. And there are also religious sentiments attached. Keeping in mind all these facts, the issue should not be made controversial,” said spokesperson Shakeel Ahmad.

    Ads by Google

    Chidambaram also got support from unexpected quarters when Samajwadi Party (SP) general secretary Amar Singh defended his presence at the meeting, and said the BJP should not politicise the issue. “We should find a middle path. Muslims are not against Vande Mataram but have religious compulsions against singing it,” Singh said.

    The statement said “Chidambaram was reading from a prepared text and there was no occasion to depart from that text.”

    Refusing to accept this, senior BJP leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi said the Home Minister, who has the entire intelligence apparatus at his disposal, should know such things in advance. “I am surprised that the Home Minister of a country in which terrorism, separatism and Naxalism are at their peak was not aware that he was going to attend a programme where our national song was insulted.”

    Mufti Md. Obaidullah QasmiBy: Mufti Md. Obaidullah Qasmi | 05-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Vande Matram contains some lines which declare the soil of motherland a deity to be worshipped.This is against the concept of monotheism and NO IDOL WORSHIP of Islam, christianity,Arya Samaj,Sikhism and Parsis.Even worshipping mother or Prophet is not allowed for Muslims. Hence,demanding Muslims to sing it is, in fact,demanding them to convert to non-Islam, which is a very dangerous demand.Not singing Vande Matram does not mean not loving the motherland in the same manner as Muslims do not worship their actual mothers and their Prophet but they love them Muslims have always proved their patriotism. Expression of love for one's motherland does not lie only in singing it. There are many ways to express it.Can we say all nationalists and Chattopadhyay himself remained unpatriotic before his composition of this poem in 1875? Can Muslims be justified in demanding all Indians to be buried in the Indian soil in spite of being burnt after death? NO.Then why are they being demanded to sing it
    NO IDOL WORSHIP of IslamBy: N.V.SANKARAN | 07-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward But you do circle round the Ka'aba in Mecca and throw stones at the "Satan" during your Huj pilgrimage. These actions are also another form of worshiping inanimate objects which are also symbols for your faith, like the idols worshipped by the Hindus. You may have some other explanation, but an impartial person will not find much difference from the Idol worship of Hindus or the visit to the Ka'aba by the Muslims.
    What is patriotism?By: niraj0008 | 05-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Singing a song including our national song "Vande mataram" is not a way to show devotion, integration and patriotism to our country. This is only a symbolic thing. Hon'ble Supreme court has also stated that person may keep silence instead of singing the song and in no way this is against the nationalism. I want to raise the question who takes care of the real nationalism ? How many govt officials are not taking bribe? How many people are not evading tax? How many people are not ignoring/hampering national interest before their self interest including our leaders and industrialists? How many people are not doing crime in some way or other? Are corruption, crimes, tax evasion and non belongingness are nationalism. No one bothers these things and so many others. Real belongingness/patriotism comes from deeds not from singing a song. I don't say one should not sing national song but I say please don't raise useless issues.
    Religous sentiments?By: Siv | 05-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward So Mr. Maulana Chidambaram. You allow one religion's religous sentiments to cloud even the National Song which was also our National Anthem in its initial days? And truly with the Nation's resources at your disposal as a Home Minister, the excuse that you 'did not know' conveys the fact that 'you do not care to know' OR the fact that your apparatus is as rotten as the clergy's resolution.
    Mr.By: riversand | 05-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward nations are created, added, divided, pillaged, elevated, degenerate, and develop, are attacked and pillaged. Giving religious sentiments a slap for the glorification of a nation is pure rabble-rousing. Our nation, which is dearest to every Muslim for its innate brotherhood, generosity, welcome, simple tradition and laissez-faire should not be brought down by incendiarism.
    country comes first, not the religionBy: Plaban Hazarika | 05-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward we place the country above of all the religions.those who are not ready to sing vande mataram, must go to Pakistan and Bangladesh. if they can not realize the emotions and sentiments related to our national song, then how we can expect that we will do good for our motherland...and we are unfortunate enough to have a Home Minister like PC who is defending himself in this concern.and moreover Amar Singh, he should be hanged in the public places....Bharat Mata ki jai..Vande Mataram
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.