Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

People did not find Third Front credible: Yechury

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Sitaram Yechury
    Yechury says people did not fing Third Front credible enough.

    CPI(M) seems to be feeling bitter about its allies like BSP and JD(S) switching sides to the UPA after the Third Front's electoral debacle, with a senior party leader saying the post-poll developments have proved that the "cut and paste" alliance was a mistake.

    "You are right about BSP, JD(S) and TRS and that is precisely the point that I am making, our decision is that it was neither credible nor viable and this (deserting the pre-poll alliance) only confirmed that," CPI(M) Politburo member Sitaram Yechury has said.

    Yechury was responding to questions on Karan Thapar's Devil's Advocate programme whether it was a mistake to ally with parties which were earlier with the BJP. BSP and JD(S) are now supporting the Congress-led government while TRS has crossed over to the NDA. "That is why in retrospect, we are saying that people did not find it (Third Front) credible," he said to a question on whether they chose wrong allies like BSP.

    Ads by Google

    To a spate of questions on reported demands for General Secretary Prakash Karat's resignation, he said the Central Committee would be meeting in June to analyse the causes for the debacle and noted that Karat's quitting would only imply "escaping from responsibility".

    Asked whether veteran Marxist Jyoti Basu had advised against breaking ties with the UPA, Yechury said he might have had his opinions which were raised in party committees, "but there is no advice that has come to us."

    On Karat, Yechury maintained that the communist parties functioned on the principles of collective function and individual responsibility. "It will have to be a collective assessment that we will make of these results ... And remember, resignation also can be escape from responsibilities." To questions on critical views expressed by senior leaders and former MPs that the CPI(M) leadership had "lost touch" with the ground reality, he said "all issues will be discussed by us and we will come to a self-critical conclusion." This was the first time in last two decades that the party has no role in a secular government at the Centre and that is why the people had expressed disappointment, he said, adding the CPI(M) numbers in Lok Sabha this time have plummeted from the earlier lowest of 19 in 1967 to 16. On severe criticism of the CPI(M) by a number of Left party leaders blaming central leadership and decision to forge a Third Front, he said these views would also be considered in the review. Yechury was of the view that the way the Third Front or the state-level alliances were brought together and projected at the national level was a "mistake".

    ... contd.

    Next12
    patriotBy: ramki | 25-May-2009 Reply | Forward leftist were party to congress's misdeed for the last 4.5 years and wanted to get away with the new partners.sooner they will become political untouchables in india.beware they may damage our constitution too.Only BJP can counter them
    In'Credible' Third FrontBy: K.Suresh | 25-May-2009 Reply | Forward "People did not find Third Front credible: Yechury"- I don't think even the constituents of the so called "Third Front" found it credible. And that includes the left front. Third front was meant to be spoiler, if not an auction house in case of split verdict.
    Left is dead, long live the left....By: Ashish | 25-May-2009 Reply | Forward The philosophy of communism survives only in India in it's archaic form, even as it starts looking more like capitalism in every other alleged communist nation. CPM/ CPI has been led by old fogies to the grave and their once-strong mass base has consistenly been eroded as the polity has drifted away from empty ideology to real jobs with real wages. History will have no place for the likes of the Karats, the Yechuris and the Bardhans whose legacy would be buried in unmarked graves in the land of the plenty.
    CPM needs bold confessionsBy: charan gill | 25-May-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. Yetchury,your stalinism and sectarianism has made communism hateful in india.CPM should sincerely relate what wrongs it had made since its birth.Why did you oppose Nehru and S A Dange.Why did you go with Janta Party in 1977,opposed computerisation , cooperated with BJP in the formation of V P Singh govt?Why did you rejected congress offer of making jyoti basu PM?I think you adopt your political line on the basis of Bengal and Kerala.Reality in the rest of india is generally ignored.Bold confessions are alien to your nature.Even a layman was perceiving the bankruptcy of third alternative.How can you claim to be the wisemen of indian politics?You wanted to kill congress for all these years instead you have committed suicide.Even where congress was finished(UP,Bihar)you failed to grow.Who is pushing communal forces back?It is mainly congress.
    out dated communistBy: anil bharali | 24-May-2009 Reply | Forward Leaders of the communist parties have proved itself politically outdated.Yechuri has still trying to blame others which is not right.He must understand why Mamata Banerjee has picked up the slogans of the the left .Because present left parties and the govt.have lost the capability to deliver it.They must admit this truth.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.