Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

‘People say I am soft on terror. What should I do? Go on shouting about it?’

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Shivraj
    Shivraj Patil at the EXPRESS

    Shekhar Gupta: Would you comment on the current security situation, including the communal violence and the government’s record on governance?

    Those who are in the government would say they have done well; those outside the government would take an independent view—which is likely to be more correct—while the opposition will criticise everything that the government is doing. It was a very difficult task for the government to carry all the allies and continue to perform its duties. However, due to the mature approach of all the parties, the Prime Minister and other members of the government, there have been no difficulties in governance in the area of development. This government has taken a more liberal attitude towards economic development than the previous government. This attitude has helped to attract more investments and bring about impressive economic progress. Problems have now arisen because of the global meltdown but due to the government’s approach, it should be possible to protect our interests.

    Ads by Google

    Agriculture is doing well. We have paid a lot of attention to making food grains easily available and to restrict imports. Employment is being generated by the NREG scheme (National Rural Employment Guarantee scheme). On the social front, we are facing a very complex situation: there are tensions developing between people of different communities. Some people who are religious and fundamentalist in attitude and have parochial feelings are creating problems.

    Fortunately, there have been no threats posed to national security. Internal security has been threatened and it will be discussed in the next general elections. Such a debate is welcome to remove whatever current defects exist in the system. So far, we have paid more attention to development than to security. If there is enough security, development becomes easier. I believe we have not been able to inform the citizens properly on issues of security. National security is the responsibility of the Centre. Terrorism and crime are to be managed by the states. However, it is not possible for the Union government to say it is not responsible in any way for the current security scenario and it is wrong for the states to say we cannot cope with the situation. Cooperation between state governments and the Central government is required for the desired results. Fortunately, such coordination has been possible among all political parties.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    ServilityBy: Ashish | 20-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward A typical congress man, spineless and servile. He doesn't have the guts to call spade a spade, no wonder police force in the country feel betrayed, being headed by such a jerk
    Patil's interviewBy: SANJIV | 20-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Mr. Shivraj Patil seems to be obsessed with procedure and repeatedly points out various steps involved in following pocedures WHEN THE HOUSE IS ON FIRE. For him, procedure should be short and swift lik searching his wradrobe, gelling hairstyle to perfection, srearching right shoes and freshly ironed pair of socks, a good deodarant, chanting Satya Saibaba and Madam Mantras. This should not take much time. (Even Bollywood heroes must be doing it quickly). Aam Janata, Police force and even MMS should have patience. The best part of his interview is talking no stand on Jamia Nagar matter. He refuses to defend or even form a considered view on the actions of his own police. For heaven's sake ask him simple and stupid questions - his wardrobe, Satya Sai Baba and his miracles, Which hair gel he likes, why cant he switch over to western atire (he will look sexy in it) and can effectively compete with Amar Singh for Bollywood popularity.
    Interview with home ministerBy: Narinder Ailawadi | 20-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Instead of fiddling with your clothes, if only you could take a page out of book on how terrorism was taken care of in Punjab in the 80s
    PLEASE DO THE JOB.By: INDIAN PATRIOT | 19-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward YOU NEED TO TAKE ACTION, AND DONT SHOUT. USE YOUR WISDOM. OTHER WISE RESIGN AND LET THE COMPETNENT RULE. THANKS.WE DONT WANT TO SEE THE COUNTRY DIVIDED.
    Spineless Conress and its leaders.By: Pratapsing Pant | 19-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward This man is not only unfit to be homeminister of any nation! The manner in which the examinees from outside Mumbai were physically thrashed and beaten up by the goons of Raj Thakere tpday afternoon in the presence of the so called Police Goons of Mumbai Police and their refusing to take anyaction agaibst Raj and his goons clearly proves beyond douby that the Mumbai Police and the State Govt are behind this attacks.On the contrary another spineless Home Minister of the State and the CM by an affidavit filed before the High Court that no action is necessary to be taken against Raj and his good as they following their conscience only.None of the the Vongress leaders including SAonia has raisedany opposition to this and on the contrary more i nerested in fighting with Mayawati whbich is more imp;ortent to her.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.