Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Philosophy of poverty

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Last year, a World Bank report did talk about 130 million people having been pushed above the poverty line because of food and fuel crises and this may have been compounded by a financial crisis. However, we don’t know. BJP 2009 states, “It is a telling comment on the UPA’s performance that a whopping 55 million people have been pushed below the poverty line over the past five years. This is according to a study by the Indian Statistical Institute.” Since reading this, I have been trying to track down the ISI study, which must perforce be based on an NSS thin-sample.

    Moving on to the CPM, it doesn’t believe in BPL. In both 2004 and 2009, it wants universal PDS (public distribution system), no targeting. And stated it more strongly in 2004 — “BPL cards should be available for all those who are not income-tax payers.” It is thus a bad idea to pay income taxes, rich farmers included. Since policies are always based on the lowest common multiple of bad ideas, we can arrive at only one conclusion. India is a poor country and everyone in India must be poor. Everyone must be entitled to subsidies. Before mentioning the issue of resources, let’s flag another odd development.

    Ads by Google

    Ask any economist what India’s interest rate should be and there will be no answer. However, economists rarely have answers. Politicians have answers, even if those are cooked up by defunct economists. For instance, CPM 2009 wants credit at 4 per cent for agriculture and self-help groups (SHGs). The manifesto doesn’t specify whether this is a real or nominal rate of interest. But it must be nominal, party manifestos really talk about real matters. Since the manifesto also questions government figures about an inflation rate of 4 per cent, the CPM clearly wants a negative real rate of interest, something that will make even defunct economists scratch their heads over. Congress 2009 doesn’t mention a specific figure. However, small and marginal farmers must have credit at “lower rates” and all farmers will be waived interest if they repay bank loans. Since those who don’t (or can’t) repay will also be waived interest and principal, we have 0 per cent interest for farmers, something bank managers will scratch their heads over. The BJP also wants 4 per cent for agriculture, educational loans, spliced with higher interest rates on deposits by elder citizens. Let’s not forget the CPM’s insistence on EPF rate of more than 8.5 per cent, something other two parties don’t mention, but won’t contest.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    To say good-bye to the Indian politics of deception in 21st centuryBy: Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana | 14-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward The old fashioned hate generating issues like ‘Lord Rama’s existence’ are also deceptive and superstitious in nature as remained practice to highlight such issues cunningly and by the evil means and designs, to raise the emotions and sentiments against each other for weakening the people in India and at the same time, making them useless to interact and compete with the outer world. The time has come to say good-bye---bye-bye-bye..... to the politics of deception in 21st century to enable people of India to interact and compete with the modern world.The present leadership irrespective of any party in the country is not in postion to cop-up in the modern age with the intellect, they possess, though the presence of exceptions like Dr Manmohan Singh, a modern philosopher King of Plato and men out of youg generation could not be ruled out.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.