Premium
This is an archive article published on April 27, 2010

Phonetaps likely part of electronic babel,’passively’ intercepted

Home Minister had told Parliament that no politicians were 'tapped,' no tapping was 'authorised'.

Union Home Minister P Chidambaram told Parliament today that no politicians were “tapped,” no tapping was “authorised” and nothing has been found “in the records” of the National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO) to substantiate the Outlook report.

Sources said that one reason for this denial could be that the conversations mentioned in the report — involving Digvijay Singh and Nitish Kumar — were,in all probability,captured in an electronic sweep during deployment of “passive interceptors” in Delhi’s diplomatic enclave.

All calls within 2-3 km of these interceptors are captured in the babel recorded and the brief snatches of conversations were picked up due to the fact that several state Bhavans are also nearby. Officials in NTRO’s communication interception cell recall that these conversations — like countless others — were only “scanned” but neither logged nor retained in the agency’s conversation bank.

Story continues below this ad

So the “phone-tapping” controversy raises the important issue of the ethics of the liberal use of such passive interceptors particularly in urban areas.

Among agencies,the NTRO was the first to install the interceptors — which they called “Eagles” — inside SUVs and move them to border areas for gathering intelligence. These interceptors were meant to capture calls made by infiltrating militants who used Pakistani SIM cards. Of the countless conversations captured,the NTRO would then sift for that one valuable snatch — for example,one about a possible strike.

The first interceptors were assembled for the NTRO in 2005. Sources said that when then National Security Advisor M K Narayanan was given a demonstration of what these Eagles could do — at the agency’s Mayur Vihar facility — he is said to have urged extreme caution in the way in which these would be used given the wealth of information they captured in their huge electronic sweep. He asked for the equipment to be handed over to the Intelligence Bureau underlining that gathering domestic intelligence was NTRO’s mandate.

But the NTRO continued to be tasked with gathering inputs in border areas and moved the “Eagles” to trouble spots,say after the Batla House encounter,the Delhi blasts or more recently,the Pune blasts. With passive interceptors being devised for covering GSM/CDMA phones as well and their capabilities being enhanced to concurrently covering 256 channels or calls,the IB,Research and Analysis Wing,and local police agencies also procured them. The cost: depending on the customer requirement,between Rs Rs 1-10 crore each.

Story continues below this ad

With allegations of NTRO misusing its powers now in the open,pressure will build on the Government to clean up and end the bitter turf war within agencies. The first step has already been taken — as first reported by The Indian Express — by a full-fledged audit of the organization ordered by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG).

Sources in the CAG say that while NTRO was exempted from audits since its inception in 2004,it was its spiraling budget (for the current year pegged at Rs 1,850 crore) and the organization’s request for “flexibility” in purchases that made the CAG see red.

Narayanan had to concede to the demand of CAG Vinod Rai and the first-ever audit of an intelligence agency commenced in February.

Also worrisome are charges of corruption,nepotism and violations of serve cadre rules in recruitments flying around with regards NTRO. A former technology chief of the organization,after leaving the NTRO,has filed over 70 RTI requests with the PMO,the NTRO and the CAG demanding answers on the /going-ons within the secret establishment. The CAG will shortly take a call on whether to make its findings on NTRO public.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement