Premium
This is an archive article published on November 12, 2009

PIL demands CBI probe into foodgrain scam

A Public Interest Litigation seeking a CBI probe into the alleged foodgrain scam worth Rs 35,000 crore was filed in the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court on Wednesday.

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a CBI probe into the alleged foodgrain scam worth Rs 35,000 crore was filed in the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court on Wednesday.

Petitioner Vishwanath Chaturvedi submitted that in the foodgrain scam unearthed in 2001,the High Court order on a PIL demanding a CBI probe has not been complied with. The Union and state governments have not taken any positive step to identify and book the culprits,he added. Chaturvedi had filed the PIL for a CBI probe in 2005.

Alleging that senior officials involved in illegally exporting foodgrains to Nepal and Bangladesh are enjoying plum postings,Chaturvedi appealed to the court to get the scam probed by the CBI.

“In 2001,the scam concerning illegal export of foodgrain worth Rs 457 crore from Gonda and Sitapur came to light. Subsequent inquiry and media reports,however,suggested that the scam may have not been confined to the two districts,” said K K Singh,petitioner’s counsel. This led Chaturvedi to move the High Court in 2005 and demand a CBI probe.

“When the state government admitted that scam could be to the tune of Rs 35,000 crore and more districts could have been involved,the High Court had ordered the CBI to probe the case in 2007,” said Singh.

The CBI’s failure to submit the probe report,however,prompted Chaturvedi to move Supreme Court this year. The court,while disposing the petition asked Chaturvedi to move the High Court first.

On Wednesday,CBI counsel Bireshwar Nath submitted that the agency was probing the scam in two districts — Lakhimpur Khiri and Ballia.

Story continues below this ad

“We have prayed that all districts of the state be included in the probe,” said Singh.

A Division Bench of Justices Pradeep Kant and Ritu Raj Awasthi posted the matter for hearing in the next week. It also recommended a change in bench as one of the judges had contested as a Union government representative in the similar matter when it was filed earlier.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement