You are here: IE »   Story

Plan panel calls for Railways authority to adjust tariffs, improve fiscal health

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping
    Concerned that the Indian Railways’ failing fiscal health could upset expansion plans, the Planning Commission has again flagged the issue of setting up of a regulatory authority for it. The panel has also asked the Railways to usher in tariff reforms by addressing freight revenue and passenger fares.

    The Railways is faced with an intense fund crunch as its successive ministers have refrained from hiking travel fares, thereby bringing the monolith on the verge of bankruptcy. The decision to set up a Rail Tariff Regulatory Authority (RTRA) was taken by the NDA government in the final leg of its term. However, the plan did not find favour with the UPA.

    In a note prepared for the government, highlighting the measures needed for improving the Railways’ fiscal health, the panel has mentioned reducing cross subsidisation within freight and passenger tariffs, through the setting up of an RTRA.

    Ads by Google

    Railway minister Mamata Banerjee’s predecessor, Lalu Prasad, had during his stint rejected the plan panel’s suggestion. The former railway minister had argues that the setting up of an RTRA and putting a stop on new lines were unacceptable to his ministry. Banerjee herself is believed to not be too keen to set up such a regulator.

    The Commission has argued that the most important policy distortion in the Railways was its lopsided tariff policy, which overcharges freight movement to subsidise ordinary passenger traffic. It had earlier pointed out that overemphasis on new lines for passenger traffic and inadequate thrust on expanding capacity in areas where there was potential commercial traffic was affecting the fiscal health of the Railways, the note states.

    Railway ministry sources pointed out that the NDA government’s decision was taken without factoring in the views of the ministry, and was approved ostensibly under pressures from the finance ministry and the plan panel. Sources said that as there was no such regulator for road transport and highways sectors — where the volume of traffic is higher — there was no case for having one for the Railways.

    The state-run giant is reeling under the impact of the Sixth Pay Commission, which has imposed a financial burden of about Rs 14,600 crores. As many as 145 projects have been delayed by several years, resulting in a cost overrun of an estimated Rs 40,000 crore. Its market borrowings have increased to Rs 9,170 crore to support the higher requirement of rolling stock. In view of this, the Commission has suggested that the Railways resort to mobilising resources by undertaking tariff reforms and also through an optimal mix of internal resources, borrowing, private participation multi-lateral funding and asset management.

    Besides, the panel has also pitched for corporatising manufacturing and maintenance of rolling stock and outsourcing of activities like catering, production of coaches, wagons and locomotives. Lastly, the panel has also asked the Railways to mobilise additional resources and to induct efficiencies of the public sector, the note states.

    railway tarrifsBy: Anil | 08-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward In a country like India , railways need to handle a bulk of pasenger tarffic and also heavy cargo. this is vital for environemntal and foreighn exchequer spent on fuel. upper class railway fares if hiked can lose traffic. similarly lower class fares if hiked can lose traffic to rad which is not good for environmental. But there is scope of increasing season ticket tarrifs by 50% and increasing the II class tickets of reserved Ii class day intercity trains by 25% but by reducing crowd by changing seat arrangements to 2 by 3 from present 3 by 3. there is enough scope for augmenting capacity by introducing double decker chaircars ( ac and non AC aircooled with full backrest.earlier dobledeckers failed due to inadequate backrest and air circyulation. ) an attempt should be made to move traffic from sleeper to ac 3 tier by introdcuing cheaper ac 3 tier may be doble decker. this will elimnate cross subsidy.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.