You are here: IE »   Story

Point of departure

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    Given the seriousness of the global economic crisis, G-20 members must try and agree upon reform of the IMF by focusing on issues like legitimacy and scope. Since the IMF’s role has expanded, it needs to ensure that its actions are transparent and effective. It should also be assessed through accountability mechanisms. But the point of departure must be a restructuring of the voting mechanism to give emerging economies and those in need of assistance the leverage they need.

    — Dabiru Sridhar Patnaik

    New Delhi

    Lesson for others

    The Supreme Court’s verdict against Sanjay Dutt must serve as a lesson to every political party. The SC’s decision must be held in high esteem. It’s very important for the Election Commission to monitor individual candidates’ records and leave the courts to decide on their fitness to contest. 

    Ads by Google

    — S. Krishna Kumar

    Dombivli

    The Supreme Court’s decision to bar Sanjay Dutt from contesting elections is welcome. Apart from the EC and the law, political parties should avoid picking candidates that they may deem popular but whose flaws and misdeeds they disregard. The rest, of course, is in the hands of the electorate.

    — Mahesh Kumar

    New Delhi

    People power

    Most political parties do not have the will to abstain from offering a ticket to apparently crowd-pulling but tainted candidates. Thus it is necessary for the educated sections of society to react to the malaise and create awareness among the masses. If the public becomes vocal over its objections to dubious candidates, parties may finally refrain from fielding them.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Criminals in PoliticsBy: K.Suresh | 03-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward While welcoming supreme court's verdict regarding Sanjay Dutt's candidature, it beats me as to how a convicted person is still out on bail. Will he be allowed to be out on bail lifelong ? Will such privilege be extended to other criminals too ? Is he yet to serve his sentence because he is a celebrity? What is preventing the courts from disposing of his matter once and for all ? Is it because of such pending cases that we have so many criminals in the electoral fray ? Do people remember cases involving other celebrities - Salman Khan, Saif Ali, Pataudi ? May be - celebrity cases don't die, they simply fade away from public memory.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.