Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Political parties join chorus for murder retrial

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Political parties joined the chorus for a retrial in model Jessica Lall murder case suggesting witnesses to the incident were bought over by money power, attacking Delhi police\'s "failure" to provide correct evidence and seeking law to protect to witnesses.

    "Who killed Jessica Lall, who fired the bullet... The verdict has raised questions on effective functioning of our judicial system," said CPI general secretary A B Bardhan, after its two-day national executive meeting.]

    He said the issue would certainly be raised in Parliaments it shows that "those who have the money and connections can get away with even murder."

    The national executive also expressed deep concern at the "total failure of the Delhi police" to present properly the evidence in the case and demanded setting up of an effective mechanism of investigation to bring the culprit to books.

    Ads by Google

    "We are alarmed that in the capital of the country the perpetrators of the ghastly murder, who carried out the crime in the presence of so many had been let scot free by the court due to lack of evidence," the resolution said. Former Prime Minister V P Singh said witnesses in Jessica Lall murder case could have been "bought over" to change their statements in court.

    "They were overcome by money power (<I>paisa un par haavi ho gaya</I>)," he told reporters, when asked to comment on witnesses turning hostile in the case. BJP said the centre should have a re-look at the witness protection programme it had suggested in the proposal to amend the criminal procedure code during the last days of NDA government at the centre.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Meaningless Press ConferenceBy: Dr. Divyesh Raythatha | 21-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward There was a BJP meet to discuss their failure in the recent polls in Delhi. It is regretted that Vankaiya Naidu arranged a press conference after the 'manthan' but it was so clueless and he didn't give any clear reply what did they discussed and what reasons were derived for their defeat. Is there any point or value of such press conference where a political party do not give satisfying answers to reporters? Every answer given by Naidu was superficial, unexplanatory, and avoiding. It is the high time that mass media reporters should boycotting such press conferences and there should not be any coverage in their mass medium. One of the meaningless answer given by Naidu: " If we would have won we would be working in the Loksabha, if not we will be in local sabha". How disgusting was the answer!
    Change for a better tomorrowBy: Sharoo | 29-May-2009 Reply | Forward I would be happy to see professionals from the civil services to join politics as they already have the background knowledge, to change the scenario of politics as it is today.
    Internet in IndiaBy: THDSINGH | 03-May-2009 Reply | Forward I was sadly surprise to find that only 7% of people in India have access to Internet. India is selling abroad as an IT leader. I appeal to the Prime Minister of India to set programme in plan to have most of the people in India have access to the Internet in next five years. If needed foreign ISP be invited besides the domestic ISPs.
    Sadhvi Pragya's ConditionBy: Hindu Rakshak | 22-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Sadhvi Pragya who was put in jail by the ruling party has been wounded by sharp metal instruments in byculla jail by a another prisoner. It is time for all people to vote enmass for the candidate who supports Hindutva and bring to power once and for all a party that can slam to bits this vote bank dependant govt.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.