Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Politics of Missile Defence

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • As India celebrates the third successful anti-missile test conducted off the Orissa coast on Friday, New Delhi might continue to have trouble managing the politics of missile defence at home and abroad.

    Eight years ago, the external affairs minister Jaswant Singh surprised the world by embracing President George W Bush's controversial plan to accelerate the development and deployment of missiles that could shoot down other missiles, especially those armed with nuclear weapons.

    While a grateful Washington offered to share its missile defence technologies with New Delhi, there were few takers for it within the NDA government. Outside the government, the Opposition Congress party mildly, the communists wildly, and the foreign policy traditionalists in a confused manner attacked India's new interest in missile defence. On the external front, our old friends in Moscow were upset and our neighbours in Beijing angry at India's enthusiasm for missile defence.

    Ads by Google

    When power changed hands in New Delhi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh negotiated the nuclear deal with the United States in 2005, there was a second opportunity to advance India's missile defences.

    The US offered to make a joint declaration on missile defence the centrepiece of President Bush's visit to India in March 2006. Afraid of CPM's boss, Prakash Karat, the UPA held back. The government was also under immense pressure from Moscow and Beijing to join them in their global campaign against missile defence.

    After India announcing its own missile defence test for the first time in November 2006, the foreign policy conservatives began to own it as a 'national achievement'; the left was unmoved. While the comrades held India's military space programme in check, China stunned the world in January 2007 by testing an anti-satellite weapon in space.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Anti missle systemBy: rama | 12-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Sooner or later, the Isalmic terrorist are going to use nuclear weapons in our land,with the local Muslim support. More likely, it will not be a nuclear armed missele. It will be a small nuclear bomb that will go off in middle of Mumbai or New Delhi. What sort defence can any country have against such a terrorist act?
    Anti missle systemBy: Harry | 12-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward I think Mumbai and Delhi should be willing to sacrifice themselves for the noble idea of secularism, as Rajiv Gandhi had said he would have rather India destroyed rather than leave secularism.
    Surveillance is the keyBy: Gaurav | 13-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Not sure if you are aware, but cities like New York and London have cameras tracking movement of people and also have radition detectors which are meant to detect nuclear material if it makes it to the cities.
    Ban anti national partyBy: Deepak | 11-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Very good article. Congratulation to writer
    Politics of Missile DefenceBy: Viswanadh C | 11-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Mr Raja Mohan is to the point when he says "...the case for new military technologies must be rooted in an appreciation of our own security interests and cannot be subject to the ideological fancies of a few". Let us learn to guard our interests first!
    Factual inaccuraciesBy: Abhishek D | 11-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. C. Raja is inaccurate on many counts. Russia and China never expressed worry on India's missile shield. Russia itself sold India it's S-300 anti-missile system back in 1997. China also procured this system from Russia. Secondly, the last missile test used signals from a constellation of US satellites to help track the "enemy" missile. The facility is given by US only to it's allies like Japan, Israel and south Korea. What India did refuse from the US was commercial sale of Patriot missile shield, because India is developing one on it's own. Russia and Israel are also frantically lobbying New Delhi to purchase their Arrow and S-400 missile shields respectively. However, Delhi has wisely refused and is letting DRDO continue development on it's own shield.
    Missile Shield SystemBy: B.K.Chapra | 11-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Indian Scientists are capble of developing any thing provided they are given opportunity to do so. Uor best brains are used by others. The institutional politics is our greatest enmy of development/ achievements.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.