Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Ponting still setting fields for McGrath, Warne: Barry

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Ricky ponting
    Barry Richards advised Ponting to ‘dramatically change’ his thinking on placements for the current lot.

    "Graeme Smith got strongly criticised for setting defensive fields. I disagree with that because on the flat wickets you have these days you need to be able to save runs," Richards said.

    "Defensive fields in a way become attacking fields. You need to have an in and out field. People say third man is a defensive position, yet 30 per cent of all Test runs go through there at the WACA," he added.

    Ponting also drew flak from former Test batsman and WACA Chief Executive Graeme Wood for critising the WACA pitch for the loss.

    "One side got 20 wickets, one side didn't. When you are 162-7 in the second innings, I don't think you can point the finger at the wicket," Wood said.

    "At one stage the wicketkeepers were back 25 metres. Brett Lee bounced one over the keeper's head. In the Ashes series we didn't receive any criticism when Shane Warne took that last wicket and they won the Test on the fifth day," he said.

    Ads by Google

    WACA curator Cam Sutherland, on his part, questioned Australia's preparation and said Ponting had not even consulted him before the Test.

    "I haven't had any communication with Ricky. He hasn't spoken to me and there was absolutely nothing about the pitch," Sutherland said.

    Previous12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.