Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Potemkin battles

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Just when it seemed advisable that Pakistan measure the Taliban threat in terms of its ability to hold the extremists to their word — as against the dramatic sport of calculating the physical distance of the militants from Islamabad — that distance and how effectively and sincerely the Pakistani government is battling to drive them back, has now assumed paramount importance. Of course, that only reaffirms the need to hold them to their word. The Swat peace deal was always a problem because it let the Taliban spread to adjoining areas, effectively negating the writ of the state. In the first week of this month, the Swat Taliban entered Buner district, about 60 miles from the capital. At the end of last week, the Taliban made a show of withdrawing, only to get involved in a battle with the Pakistani armed forces forthwith.

    The Pakistani establishment, amid arm-twisting from the United States to focus on the real threat of the Taliban instead of India, appeared to at last wake up and launch aerial campaigns against militant positions in Buner, along with a ground offensive. But despite the strong words from Interior Minister Rehman Malik about the government’s intention to thwart those trying to destabilise Pakistan, it cannot be gainsaid that there’s something odd about the whole episode. For one, it all seems a bit too well-coordinated or well-timed — the militants entrench themselves in Buner and Shangla, they pretend to withdraw but hold on, the government warns and the military moves in, heavy casualties are reported and then the Swat deal is under threat. All the while, the establishment breathlessly publicises its action for the benefit of its benefactors. Could events have followed a different course without the US admonition and conditions to aid?

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Beware India!By: Ashutosh Kaul | 30-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Taliban is not in Swat or Buner as the Pakistan would like the world to believe. They are in Islamabad, sitting right there in GHQ.In fact taliban is just another divison of Pakistan army. You can compare them to casuals and workers on call. Whenever Pakistan calls on them, they will move in and out of different locations as per need. Pak Army is duplicitous; US is naive if not downright stupid. Sadly India has no plan in place and zero political will to act proactively. Each will have to pay a heavy price, sooner than you think!
    Zardari VisitBy: Dev | 30-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Hi, Zardari is visiting US next week. This offensive against Taliban and the US visit, something more than just co-incidence !rgdsdev
    Wait for American reactionBy: R.Kannan | 30-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward The editorial is correct as the Pak army appears to have stage managed the whole issue. The only question is what is agreed between the Pak army
    victim-rescuer-perpetrator gameBy: Ritu | 30-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Pakistan manages to play the victim card and gets US to rescue it almost all the time. It is extremely naive of the US to always fail to see that Pakistan is actually the perpetrator of the crime (violence) it claims to be the victim of. India has always seen through this game and enlightened the US albeit unsuccessfully. So it is only proper that India refrains from even issuing any comment and let the US find about it on its own.
    Protecting India Action Plan - some adviceBy: Vinay | 30-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Seeing the hand-in glove of Pakistan Army / Taliban
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.