In an article, M.D. Nalapat explains how the Congress “bowed to the CPM bully,” and why “Prakash Karat knows Sonia Gandhi better than Manmohan Singh”. He writes: “The virtual PM of India believed that the UPA chairperson would let go at least another year of the goodies that power is delivering to her and instead spend huge amounts on a Lok Sabha election, just so he could keep his promise to George W. Bush. He ought to have known better.” And continues in the same vein, “Of course, had Manmohan Singh himself had any backbone, he would himself have quit rather than turn into an international laughing stock, but Sonia of the Maino clan has chosen her man well...”

But, he says, “Karat knew better. He put his party’s future on the line by betting that Sonia Maino would blink at the thought of losing the benefits of power, and blink is what she did. After deceptively roaring in Haryana about ‘anti-national’ elements, she slunk back to her government-provided mansion and unfurled the surrender flag.”

Dynasty again

Another columnist is angry at Rahul Gandhi taking over as Congress general secretary. M.V. Kamath writes, “Presently to a party which has no young leaders of standing, Rahul seems the obvious candidate. It is calculated dynasticism of a kind, but what is remarkable is that there is hardly any voice raised. Sycophancy rules the roost. One, of course, does not know what would have happened if Indira had lived long enough though Sanjay Gandhi would still have been around. Rahul Gandhi’s empowerment presently is an insult to Congress, but who can blame Sonia Gandhi... Nehru dynasty, it seems, is being thrust on India, almost by accident. It was not a pre-planned thing. Circumstances make history. But does that mean we must necessarily accept fate as the guiding factor in our political growth? Is Congress so poor in its constituency that a nation of 1.2 billion people cannot provide it leadership apart from the Nehru dynasty?”

... contd.