Prajapati encounter: ‘Raiger should be held responsible’
Related
Top Stories
- Former Ranji player held, Sreesanth and others to be produced in court today
- Li Keqiang pitches for more Chinese investments as he backs trade balance
- All eyes on Narendra Modi as BJP set to discuss strategy for Lok Sabha polls
- SC agrees to hear PIL to stay IPL matches due to spot-fixing
- Monstrous tornado rips through US city of Oklahoma, 90 dead
The lawyer of retired Director General of Police O P Mathur, who is a co-accused in the Tulsiram Prajapati encounter case, told a special CBI court on Wednesday that G C Raiger, who is also a former DGP, should be held responsible for the killing.
On the fifth day of argument on the issue of not taking prior approval from the state government before naming government officials in the case, Mathur's lawyer V D Gajjar said Raiger knew that inspector V L Solanki's letter seeking approval to interrogate Prajapati was lying with Additional DGP Geetha Johri. However, as the head of CID (crime), he didn't react to the denial of permission to Solanki, Gajjar alleged.
"If the story of Raiger is to be believed, he was aware of the so-called development in the Prajapati case yet he didn't inform anyone. If he got illegal instruction from (the then state home minister) Amit Shah, why didn't he react at that time itself? The question is why didn't he inform the governor or the chief secretary at that time?" Gajjar said.
He told the court that Raiger should be considered responsible for the murder of Prajapati and the court should take cognizance of this fact.
A day earlier, Gajjar had attacked DIG Rajnish Rai, a witness in the case, claiming it was Rai who lost the CD containing details of the killings of Sohrabuddin Sheikh and his wife Kauserbi. Rai had first investigated the case.
Meanwhile, Shah's lawyer Nirupam Nanavati argued that his client had nothing to do with the encounter of Prajapati. He said CBI's claims that there was a meeting between Shah and senior police officers, including ATS chief and Border Range DIG, to eliminate Prajapati, were baseless.
"Assuming that there was a meeting and there are call records of Shah and other senior officials, it doesn't amount to conspiring a murder. These call records are part of Shah's officials duty which he was performing," Nanavati said.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


Modi addresses farmers, blames Centre for delay in Narmada gates
'Top cop Pandey, now on run, plotted Ishrat encounter with IB man'
NIA nabs 2 Ajmer Sharif blast suspects in Vadodara
Youth shot, Amreli tense as groups clash



















