Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Prantij riot case: SIT contemplates action against 3 witnesses for perjury

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Prantij riot case
    Prantij riot case

    The Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) intends to drag three Hindu witnesses to court for alleged perjury in the controversial murder case of British nationals near Prantij in Sabarkantha during the 2002 riots.

    Kalusinh Makwana, Badarsinh Makwana and Dalpat had recently retracted their earlier statements before designated judge HP Patel at Himmatnagar.

    The three had named Mitha Patel, Chandu Patel, Praveen Patel, Manoj Patel, Rajesh Patel and Kala Patel as accused in the case when they gave their statements before the then investigating officer, Inspector D K Vankar, in April 2002.

    According to the details of the case, on February 28, 2002, British national Imran Dawood, then a boy of 18, had made his maiden visit to India along with his UK-based uncles —Saeed Dawood, Shakeel Dawood and Mohammed Aswat.

    Ads by Google

    The four had toured Jaipur and Agra, and were returning to their native village Lajpur near Prantij in Sabarkantha district where a mob blocked their way and set ablaze their Tata Sumo. Saeed and Aswat along with their Gujarati driver Yusuf Piraghar were hacked to death, while Shakeel went missing. It is presumed he is dead.

    Imran was seriously injured and was rescued by the Prantij police. The boy was later made a complainant in an FIR lodged in connection with the case. The case (26/02 of Prantij police station) is among the nine riot cases being further investigated by the SIT.

    In 2005, DySPs J R Prajapati and H L Chaudhary recorded the statements of the three witnesses again, who endorsed their earlier statements recorded by Vankar.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.