Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Probe gives clean chit to teacher

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The departmental inquiry ordered into the death of Shanno Khan, a student of the MCD Girls Primary School in Bawana, has given a clean chit to Manju Sharma, the teacher who was accused of making the girl stand in the sun for three hours that led to her death.

    The report is based on the statements of teachers and the principal of the school. With parents and local politicians in Bawana forcing a shutdown of the school, the probe committee could not speak to any student, Education Committee chairman Prithviraj Sahni told Newsline on Sunday.

    The report of the departmental inquiry, conducted under Education Director Premlata Kataria, has been now submitted to the vigilance department for further inquiry.

    The separate vigilance inquiry into Shanno’s death, too, did not progress much with the department not being able to trace the children, according to Sahni.

    Ads by Google

    “The school will open tomorrow, after which the vigilance inquiry should proceed. We had not been able to record the statements of students since they were not coming to school,” said Sahni.

    Manju had allegedly punished Shanno for not answering a question in class. The girl’s family had alleged that she had been made to crouch “like a hen” in the sun for three hours and that the teacher had also put bricks on her shoulders when she complained. Shanno reportedly fainted and later slipped into a coma. While the incident occurred on April 15, Shanno died two days later.

    Her postmortem report, released on April 23, blamed the death on delayed medical attention after an epilepsy attack. Before taking the unconscious 11-year-old to a hospital, the police said, Shanno’s parents had taken her to a maulvi for treatment.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    we are quick to blameBy: elaine fernandes | 29-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Although this was an unfortunate case, we should not blame the teacher blindly. do we bother to applaud them when they do good - surely not - then why are we so quick to blame. even in the hands of parents so many children lose their lives - do we punish them?? if we do not trust the teachers we should keep our children at home instead of sending them to school.
    Punishing minors is criminalBy: Seema Zafar | 29-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Any adult who punishes a minor does so wrongly. No good teacher will punish his/her student.All students have equal right to attend school and no teacher has the right to punish. They must learn better ways to teach.
    What kind of probe?By: Ram Nath Babu | 27-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward The enquiry commission has given a clean chit to the teacher without speaking to the students. Other teachers obviously will back their colleague and so is the principal. Only students will tell the truth and the commission without speaking to a single student arrived at its decision. Just an eye-wash.
    exploiting sympathy By: madan mohan joshi | 27-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward It has become a fashion to become sentimental in the name of poor and blame everyone else for any incident concerning them . Our media has started a habit of prosecuting even before any evidence surfaces. the case against Ms Uma Khurana is fresh. In this case because blaming the teacher ( alongwith the whole teaching fraternity) sensationalises the case with more readership and viewership, the media and a few overjealot newsmen are perpetrating a great injustice to the innocent teacher. Remember that such cases have been exploited by petty local leaders and some greedy parents to extract sympathy plus monetary help from the Govt.
    Shame on You!By: Seema Zafar | 29-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward A teacher who punishes her student to death is not innocent.Calling parents greedy, who lost their child to this criminal act is a shameless act. If you can not stand up for justice than shut up.
    MurgaBy: Rajiv | 27-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward We have seen small girls working in sun carrying bricks everyday. How can we attribute death with this, without any proof. It has become fashionable to support poor people especially if they are from minorities.
    Learn to be human!By: Seema Zafar | 29-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward If you can not support poor than you are no good.Do you mean that it's ok to punish a eleven year old and put bricks on her shoulders? What if this happened to your child? Would you enjoy that?? and defen the perpetrator of the crime??
    Aneesha Mathur, for your information Manju tortured the child not MoulviBy: Seema Zafar | 27-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward The article seems to support the theory generated by defenders of Manju that little Shano died because her helpless mom ran with the child in her arms to see the Moulvi imediately before she took her to the hospital.Well as is evident Moulvi advised her to take the child to the hospital immediately. Don't forget that this is a poor woman with no resources, and she was trying to get help.No one in the School was kind to help this poor lady or the unconscious child, who had become unconscious because of being in heat and in physical pain for which only Manju is responsible.Moulvi is equivalent to your pujari and was the only person willing to help, guide and refer the child to the hospital at that time. Since when has this become a crime??? And Why this lame attempt to shield the real culprit Manju??? and her Sympathizers???
    Pujari Vs MoulviBy: R. Nair | 27-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Strange Seemaji - Where did the issue of Pujari came up? I think you forgot a belief in India is " Maatha, Pitaa, Guru
    No difference between a Pujari and MoulviBy: Seema Zafar | 29-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward I guess you missed the point, I will appreciate a better understanding of this crime against an innocent and an attempt to cover-up.Thank You
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.