The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution Richard Dawkins Bantam Press 470 pages 5.99 pounds" />
Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

QED, evolution

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Not too many people remember James Ussher (1581-1656) today. He was the Archbishop of Armagh and using Old Testament records, deduced the earth was created on the evening of Saturday, 22nd October, 4004 BCE. Rather oddly, the production quality in this book is shoddy. However, Richard Dawkins’s academic credentials are anything but shoddy. But his influence transcends that of a pioneering and successful academic, since he is a popular writer too. That began with The Selfish Gene (1976), followed by The Extended Phenotype (1982), The Blind Watchmaker (1986) and The God Delusion (2006).

    That Richard Dawkins writes extremely well is undeniable. His work on evolutionary biology has been seminal. But Dawkins is also a critic of creationism and intelligent design. He is an atheist (and a militant one at that) and scientific rationalist, taking on religion, alternative medicine, astrology, spiritualism and other similar stuff, often through documentaries. This book isn’t about those broader issues. It’s limited to evidence for evolution.

    Ads by Google

    Do we still need evidence for evolution? Evidently, we do, because those whom Dawkins describes as “history-deniers” are more pervasive in their influence than we think. The opinion polls given in the appendix are revealing. In 2008, 44 per cent of Americans believed “God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years or so”. In Britain, 22 per cent believe “God created human kind pretty much in his/her present form at one time within the last 10,000 years”. This book is full of nuggets, not just in the text, but also in the footnotes. There is one such quote from (British zoologist) Peter Medawar: “The spread of secondary and latterly of tertiary education has created a large population of people, often with well-developed literary and scholarly tastes, who have been educated far beyond their capacity to undertake analytical thought”.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Polemic and realityBy: R Gopu | 20-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward The "rational" polemical discourse of Richard Dawkins (and his colleague in anti-theism Chistopher Hitchens, author of "God is not Great", are based on the fundamentally flawed notion that all human beings are rational at all times, and that they will be swayed by logical argument. It is blindingly clear that most human beings are emotional, and the most fanatic among us will kill or die for their beliefs, even if they are not based on fact. No rational person should or would do the same.This irrationalism is what makes good things like poetry, love, charity, sacrifice, fiction, art, humour and imagination possible; it also fuels useful things of debatable value like religion, commerce, government, research; and deadly things like genocide, war, slavery, ethnicism and pollution possible.Unfortunately the rationalist believes that reason and education are cures for irrationality despite all historical evidence to the contrary. Remember - Darwin is glorified; Wallace is forgotten!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.