We would like to draw Mr Karat’s attention to a robust opinion piece he had written in

The Hindu on November 9, 2005. Two points he made are relevant. Karat had argued Natwar Singh was being targeted in the Volcker report for opposing the Iraq invasion and leading a Congress delegation to Iraq. He had also questioned whether the Iraqi oil vouchers were at all an “illegal deal through political patronage” or whether they were, more innocently, “a business transaction like other contracts entered into by Indian business enterprises”. So, in November 2005 Karat had said Natwar Singh was a victim of imperialist conspiracy and that the oil deals were probably quite kosher.

Two questions Mr Karat. If the oil vouchers were ordinary business transactions why does the question of probing private companies come up? And if the oil vouchers were not so kosher — we are presuming you have changed your mind on that — then is the Volcker report no longer an imperialist conspiracy? It surely can’t be that the oil deals were sleazy when applied to private companies and perfectly honourable when related to Natwar and his family and associates. There may well be a case for expanding the Volcker findings probe. But there cannot be a more unconvincing advocate for it than Prakash Karat. He’s asking to see the dirty linen after handing out clean chits.