Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Quota for Muslims is a double-edged sword: Khurshid

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Khurshid
    Quick impact schemes needed: Khurshid
    In contrast to predecessor A R Antulay who maintained a studied silence on the the issue of reservation, newly-appointed Minority Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid has called quota for Muslims a “double-edged sword” which could create “envy, hostility and resistance”. He has instead advocated affirmative action as a tool to “inject an ability to compete” rather than make them “constant beneficiaries of additional help”.

    In an interview to The Indian Express, Khurshid said it was time to explore “angles” other than reservation. He said it was his intention to roll out some “quick impact” schemes and fine-tune delivery of recommendations made by the Justice Rajinder Sachar committee.

    “You don’t want to try and please somebody and not get them the comfort of actually getting any relief. I think it is much better to get substantive relief, substantive opportunity rather than stick your mind only on one particular way of doing it.”

    Ads by Google

    “If you can get them what they want by another method... what they want is opportunity, why should we just follow a standard line of reservation. There may be a better way. If there isn’t then, we will come back to discussing reservation. Let us look at other angles,” Khurshid said when asked about implementation of the Ranganath Mishra committee report which he maintained he had not read.

    “I don’t think we have clarity on reservation. There are expectations and demands for reservation of all kinds... I think what we need to do is look at affirmative action a little more seriously. Reservation is a double-edged sword for Muslims. Must not do anything that creates envy, hostility and resistance,” he said.

    His comments come at a time when there is a clamour among Muslim organisations for implementation of the Ranganath Mishra Committee report which suggested, among other things, 15 per cent reservation for minorities (of this 10 per cent should be for Muslims) in education and employment. The report has been gathering dust at the Minority Ministry for the last two years.

    The Mishra commission for religious-linguistic minorities had also demanded SC status for Dalit Christians and Dalit Muslims.

    Khurshid said it was time to “look at affirmative action a little more seriously” with a view to “inject an ability to compete rather than becoming constant beneficiaries of additional help”. In this context, he said the list of institutions, where scholarships would be awarded, should be expanded to include some outstanding private schools as well.

    “The biggest scheme is scholarship. But the scholarship today is largely empowerment scholarship... I think we need to have greater emphasis on excellence. We don’t want to fall into the Macaulay trap of creating clerks. It is important to move from being peons to being clerks. But we want to make CEOs as well,” he said.

    Besides fine-tuning implementation of the Sachar committee recommendations, he said his immediate priority would be to identify some “quick-impact” schemes like setting up big medical centres and universities in rural areas.

    “If you come up with a housing project in Bhadohi it will have an impact, identified clearly as an outcome of our efforts to implement the Sachar committee report. I think a major big hospital in eastern Uttar Pradesh will have an impact... A hospital is not going to treat Muslims only, it will treat everybody. But there will be a sense, if it comes, that Muslims are not just asking, but they are giving,” he said.

    “Whatever we do must convince people that it is effective and it has an impact. It should not be and must not appear to be window-dressing to fulfill some goody-goody behaviour expectations. It must have grassroot impact,” he added.

    What is the big deal in the biggest "democracy" in the World?By: Russell | 11-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward You people sound like racists. Talking about Hindu property and Muslim property. Get over yourselves. You do not own this land/earth. It was given you to steward, to see how you will use it. Will you stake it off and claim it as your own and deny all who come after, or will you nourish it and let it provide for you and everyone around you, including your muslim/hindu/christian/buddhist/name your poison here. If you own something, you can loose it - so be careful what you own as it will soon be lost!
    Quota for Muslims is a double edged sword, KhurshidBy: Vasoo Kamulkar | 10-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward For Javed (continued from part III Why have Hindu temples been razed in those countries while thousands of little mosques being raised every year in India? Vote-bank scavenging sycophants of the Nehru family give a damn!It looks like Dr AZ Mhammed is not happy with Mr Salman Khurshid.I also worries him that the Indian Muslims are not shining. The Muslim community Mullahs are the root cause of this. The secular Government of India subsidises the Madrasas, which mushroom all over India.Is the money used to make the Muslim youths more competitive in Science and Technology or just wasted in imparting only Qur'anic wisdom and feeding hatred towards India? Dr. Manmohan Singh has recently proclaimed that the Muslim minority in India has the first right over Indian resources. All Dr. Mhammed has now to do is buy electrical paraphernalia. Financial current will ensue. There will be Id illuminations through out the year. Jai Ho Nehru name and sycophants! (PART IV concluded)
    Quota fot Muslims is a double edged Sword, KhurshidBy: Vasoo Kamulkar | 10-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Just give us a Wakf Land says JAVED (contd.)(b) The Muslims in India hate the Hindus. The Koran commands them to do so. Their religious priorities compel them to disregard India as their Mother Land. It therefore follows that quite a high percentage of Hindus do not relish pluralism. Of course, Javed will be quick to raise the Constitution bogey here. One can only ask him to listen to his inner voice. Which side he would Consider also the plain facts of life, which the Hindu leaders of yore and their prototypes of today Were unable to fathom. The Muslim population in India has been doubled since the Partition while the Hindu population in Pakistan and Bangladesh is being inversely dwindling almost to a zero. Pundits are being kicked out of Kashmir. As if this is not enough, the terrorists casually enter India, get support from the local community and kill Hindus mercilessly.None raises an eyebrow over this. What has happened to the Hindu property in Pakistan? PART III
    Fundamental mistake.By: Dr.G.G.Rajan | 10-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward If the political parties and their leaders are really interested in uplifting the country, quota system based on religion must be immediately scrapped. Instead, all admissions and employment should be strictly based on merit and economic considerarions.Only this approach will cover all the economically weaker section of the society irrespective of caste and religion.I really wonder, why the leaders fail to think in this line! The current practice of Congress-led UPA is to 'divide and rule' the country by religion /caste .For achieving this only the quota for minorities, SC/ST/OBC etc had been created right from Nehru's regime.Right to education policy proposed by the UPA is nothing but a cheap trick.What has the HR ministry done to improve literacy and educational standards ? For making the right to education policy successful, the first step is to motivate the children by councelling. This will create additional job opportunities, which the Govt should plan.
    Quota for Muslims is a doble eged sword, says KhurshidBy: Vasoo Kamulkar | 10-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Just give us a wakf land/property, our rights/control; not aid/reservation" says JAVEDRegrettably, it is hard for the Hindus to share his sentiments as they have realised that after eating the cake Muslims now also want to have it. Javed should ponder upon two ground realities. (a) On the 14th of August 1947, bowing to the Muslim demand, India was partitioned and Pakistan created as their homeland. Consequently, on the 15th of August 1947, the wretched Hindu slaves were released from the yoke of the Mughal and British tyranny. Any first year law student should be able to concur that whatever remained of India after the division, belonged solely to the Hindus for their own enjoyment. All villages, towns and cities with their natural and fabricated resources, chattel, and entire land including the so-called Wakf Board properties, the Taj Mahal in Agra and the Jinnah House in Mumbai now remained Hindu properties.(PART II)
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.