Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Rail debate jumps track to your state vs mine

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Lalu
    The discussion on the Railway Budget in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday had MPs taking swipes at each other, forcing Railway Minister Mamata Banerjee to join issue — at times snapping in anger, at times in bemusement at Opposition members.

    Ananth Kumar, BJP leader and MP from Bangalore (South), who initiated the debate, accused Mamata of reducing the Railways to a modern-day variant of the “East India Company”. “You have made this Railway Budget an election manifesto for Bengal. Out of 309 model stations being proposed, 40 are from Kolkata, and 97 from Bengal. Sara Bengal, baaki sab kangal (Everything for Bengal; nothing for rest),” said the BJP leader. The minister replied that “other members were free to suggest names of stations, which would be duly incorporated in the proposed scheme”.

    Kumar added that the budget might help her win elections in the state, “and his party would support her bid for chief ministership as that would rid the state of Communists”, but wanted to know why “Bangalore had fallen off the minister’s radar”. Visibly upset, Mamata told him: “I think of Bangalore also (but) do not insult my state. I respect your state, I respect India (but) don’t disrespect Bengal.” Ananth retorted: “I love Vivekananda, I love Rabindranath Tagore, I love Vande Mataram, more than Mamataji does. But don’t insult Karnataka or other states.”

    Ads by Google

    The inter-state divide then got extended to the western frontiers. Congress Nagpur MP Vilas Muttemwar, while praising the Budget, inadvertently referred to Mumbai as “Bombay”, prompting BJP MP Gopinath Munde to demand an immediate correction. Muttemwar made amends. BJP MP Shahnawaz Hussain, who had joined Munde in having a go at Muttemwar, drew fire from the Congress leader. “How can you not praise the Railway Budget? This is, after all, for the first time that students of madrasas have been included under the railway concession pass scheme,” said Muttemwar, to which Hussain replied: “This has been done only grudgingly”.

    The tale of India, interwoven in the Railways, didn’t stop there. BJP members claimed that “Duronto” — a new scheme introduced by Mamata — meant “tragic” in Kannada, “which explained the larger tenor of the Budget”. Mamata’s deputy in the Ministry, K H Muniappa, tore apart the claim and said that “the BJP members had got their facts wrong” and the word was “Turanto, which had Sanskrit origins, and which meant fast”.

    With MPs airing state-based grievances, former railway minister Lalu Prasad Yadav, statesman-like on Tuesday, had the last word: “Lalu never discriminated against other states (during his tenure). I was also told about the discrimination against Bihar (in the present Budget). But it is not West Bengal, nor is it a Gujjar-like agitation (and therefore we didn’t take to the streets in Bihar). When Railway property is harmed, it is my body that burns. It is neither mine, nor yours. It is Indian Railways.”

    bmkBy: B M KUMAR | 09-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward It is not surprising that politicians behave pulling resources to their home turf. The comments on this articles reflect the public apathy towards such acts. The politicians attitude is not reserved by one party or other. No party or politician thinks in terms of INDIA. Unfortunate indeed. The regional or one can even term it selfish attitude is the outcome of few major factors. 1) Lack of strong leadership at the head (UPS or NDA the head of the government has little vision
    Railways jumps track to your ' state vs mine '..................By: M Krishnamachary | 08-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Nothing new in that most politicians favour their states and constituencies over others in planninf for new projects. One need not be surprised if the MP from Lakshadwip too wants a rail link to his constituency. Or they will not find a place in Parliament the next time. A matter of survival. Railways is all-India in reach and is divided, as the country is, into so many 'divisions'. Then for admin reasons, now for political favours. Other uses of railways is as prime target of political protest for torching and destruction. Some politicians usually attribute natural disasters like cyclones too to political adversaries!!! Present Rail budget plans extention to N-E states and it is the brightest part of the 'rail budget'. Thanks to Miss Mamta Banerji.What Ananth Kumar is doing is what all the MPs in 'opposition' do. Practise jaded politics. Your article rightly points to the usual antics of some MPs, speaking on irrelevant matters. People are not bothered much . They know it all.
    Rail debate jumps track to your state vs mineBy: Hubert Pereira | 08-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I agree that it is indeed Indian railways! Hence it is also important that INDIAN requirement is taken care unilaterally instead of any state being given priority or importance with an eye on the forthcoming elections in West Bengal. One does not need or should be allowed to use the Rail wagon to beat the communists.All that needs to be done is think India and behave like a true Indian, and it’s development for the future generations.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.