Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Rain not the only spoilsport for paddy

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Last fortnight, Kerala’s paddy farmers took a strong beating after the state was lashed by strong, unseasonal showers: 1.4 lakh tonnes of paddy worth crores of rupees was damaged in 28,231 hectares. Even as politicians squabbled and the state government announced Rs 10,000 per hectare as special financial assistance, the calamity underscored the many ills plaguing paddy cultivation in Kerala.

    Rice is a staple in a state that requires nearly 40 lakh tonnes annually, but produces barely enough to last a couple of months or meet 40 per cent of its needs. It is forced to import the rest from neighbours—as it did a century ago. Unexpected rains may not have much to do with the dismal record.

    Kerala is a wet, tropical state that receives about 300 cm of rain a year and has 44 rivers. Even the Green Revolution that many states leveraged to great success didn’t have too great an impact on the state. In fact, an IIT-Chennai study had pointed out how its high-yielding variety seeds led to less than 40 per cent increase in paddy output.

    Ads by Google

    A decade ago, the Kerala Agricultural University’s action research programme—Group Approach to Locally Adopted and Sustainable Agriculture (GALASA)—had said that Kerala’s paddy farmers were not accessing or using easily available technology, neglecting scientific planting of good quality seedlings, and not using enough organic manure or going for properly integrated water and pest management.

    Little wonder then that even pioneering legislations have failed to rescue paddy farming. The Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act of 1969 aimed at breaking the feudal farm land ownership and sought to give farms to actual tenants and put a firm cap on land holdings. However, the ironic fallout was that 88 per cent of the land came to be owned by people who did work other than farming. No less than 94 per cent of farm land was fragmented to less than one hectare holdings, implying that many new owners found farming unviable and continued to sell their labour to survive.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.