Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Raj HC stops shooting of Salman's film at Amer Fort

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Veer

    Shooting of Salman Khan' film 'Veer' at historic Amer Fort here will be discontinued with the Rajasthan High Court today ordering the film unit to pack up its bags from the protected monuments where a wall collapsed during filming yesterday.

    While ordering the film unit to stop shooting, a Division Bench comprising Justice Ashok Parihar and Justice G S Sarraf also issued a notice to the state government to explain why strict norms related to "protected" historical monuments were not followed in the case.

    "Money and greed, coupled with power create blindness, madness and the person becomes totally insane and insensitive.

    When the Government and public authorities indulge in such practice, a great havoc is created resulting in chaos all around. The episode and mishap happened in Amer Palace, Jaipur yesterday is a glaring example of the same," the court said.

    Ads by Google

    Besides, Bollywood star Salman Khan the film also features state tourism minister Bina Kak.

    The court took a strong view on yesterday's incident in which at least 15 onlookers, including two cameramen, were injured when a portion of wall at the historic Amer Fort collapsed during shooting of the film.

    It also sought a detailed report with regard to giving permission for constructing a huge set and film shooting in the complex even though there is restriction on photography and video shooting for the tourists there.

    "The entire original land-scape of the main courtyard at the entrance of Amer Fort, Palace and Temple have been destroyed. The trees, fountains, flower beds covered by carved stone Jalees have been razed to the ground, may be, to allow the construction of huge sets for film shootings as in the present case," the court said.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    personal opinionBy: Dr B.L.Khandelwal | 18-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Remarkably expressed views on matters of protection
    veerBy: tarik | 13-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward The first reports said that it was an "artificial wall" that collapsed, leading me to think it was part of the set. Now people are saying it was an "ancient" wall. I can't rely on the accuracy of Indian media's reports, especially when it comes to Salman, so now I don't know if it was really part of the original Fort that was damaged. I still doubt it, though, because those original walls were built to withstand an onslaught of thousands of enemy troops (and did withstand them!) so I doubt that they would collapse merely because some people climbed over or stood on them. It seems, from all reports, it wasn't the wall's collapse, but the ensuing stampede, in which these people got injured. In any case, I get the strong feelling that there were many groups who were just looking for any excuse to stop the filming, so this gave them a golden opportunity. I was actually something to be made out of it, so this court order doesn't come as a surprise, unfortunately.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.