You are here: IE »   Story

Rana and wife met relatives in Meerut, Hapur, went to Taj

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    Investigators have found that Tahawwur Hussain Rana, the suspected Lashkar-e-Toiba operative — and alleged accomplice of David Headley — and his wife Samraz Akhtar visited Meerut, Hapur and Agra in November 2008.

    Rana is believed to have spent three weeks in India and left days before the Mumbai attacks.

    The couple first visited Samraz’s aunts Suraiya Bano in Meerut and Farzana Parvez in Hapur. Suraiya and Farzana are sisters of Samraz’s mother Musharraf Jahan who is settled in Pakistan.

    The couple then visited Agra, along with Farzana and her daughter Zoya Akbar, who is a school student, on November 14 and 15 last year, to see the Taj Mahal and stayed in the Manya Palace hotel.

    Farzana’s husband Akbar Ali, when contacted by The Indian Express, confirmed these visits.

    He said that an officer from the National Investigation Agency had visited him and he had passed on whatever information he had.

    Ads by Google

    “We could not believe that Rana could be involved in terror activities. When I met him, he told me that he runs an immigration business. I believe that if Rana was involved in such activities, then he would have not stayed in a cheap hotel at Agra where they paid Rs 400 for a room. I came to know that Rana was facing a financial crisis and, during the trip, it was my wife who took care of most of the expenses,” said Akbar Ali, who is an advocate.

    Rana and his wife arrived at Delhi airport on November 13 where Suraiya’s husband Saleem Ahmed received them and brought them to his home in Meerut. Akbar Ali was there in Meerut to welcome him. Later, in the evening, Akbar Ali brought the couple to Hapur in his car.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Volunteering InformationBy: Jay | 26-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward How come these guys were waiting for the NIA to visit and did not voluntarily inform the cops?
    Rana's BEING in Pak military post-1971 clue to his mentalityBy: Devasahayam | 26-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Those who stayed in that army post-1971, and especially those who were in it or joined it post-1977, can only be considered scum!
    Re: Volunteering InformationBy: Jackie | 27-Jan-2010 Reply | Forward Mr. Jay, all this information was reported to Pre-Trial services. I don't know why this is such a big deal. The guy went to India for a vacation and has a freaking dated calender to prove it. You're NIA has interviewed everyone they met with and probably now has an hour by hour schedule of what they did in India. All this hullabaloo about the tragic 26/11 attacks is only so Indians can have someone to blame. Why not use all the manpower and money used to investigate Rana to actually find the real culprits? Seriously...
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.