skip to content
Advertisement
Premium
This is an archive article published on January 13, 2010

Rathore’s lie nailed: to escape the law,he said Ruchika was expelled ‘on moral grounds’

A week after Sacred Heart School,Chandigarh,struck off the name of Ruchika Girhotra from its rolls on September 20,1990,SPS Rathore,who was convicted last month of molesting her....

Listen to this article
Rathore’s lie nailed: to escape the law,he said Ruchika was expelled ‘on moral grounds’
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

A week after Sacred Heart School,Chandigarh,struck off the name of Ruchika Girhotra from its rolls on September 20,1990,SPS Rathore,who was convicted last month of molesting her, sent a representation to the then Haryana Home Minister Sampat Singh alleging that Ruchika was expelled from the school “on moral grounds.” He also wrote that the inquiry by the then DGP R R Singh recommending registration of a case against him was “one-sided in a sub-judice matter”,according to a file noting by Sampat Singh.

Documents accessed by The Indian Express nail the lies of the convicted former DGP Rathore and the school. While the school had claimed that Ruchika was not expelled,Rathore had said that he did not know about it.

The Union Territory Administration,during the magisterial inquiry conducted by SDM Prerna Puri last week into Ruchika’s expulsion,asked Rathore: “Did you submit a representation to the CBI/ Haryana Government in the year 1990 or any time thereafter mentioning the expulsion of Ruchika Girhotra from Sacred Heart School,Sector 26,Chandigarh

Story continues below this ad

His signed reply said: “I don’t remember about it since it is a 19 years old matter. I have carefully checked (the) record connected with the trial,which was going on in Ambala and Patiala. No such letter or representation or document is available with me. Hence denied.”

However,file notings by Sampat Singh on September 27,1990 reads: “Representation by Mr Rathore alleging (the probe) to be a one-sided enquiry in subjudice matter. The girl was expelled from her school also on moral grounds. Can FIR be lodged or not.”

The notings followed the recommendation of J K Duggal,Financial Commissioner,Home,on September 4,1990,to Sampat Singh that “a case under sections 354 and 342 of the IPC be got registered from crime branch of CID.”

Ruchika was expelled from the school shortly after the first inquiry against Rathore indicted him and recommended registration of a criminal case against him on charges of molestation and wrongful confinement. It was then that he sent a representation to the Home Minister.

Story continues below this ad

Files and file notings of the Haryana government reveal how the Haryana government too toed Rathore’s line.

*On Sampat Singh’s query on whether an FIR can be lodged or not,the then Assistant Legal Rememberencer (ALR) and Under Secretary wrote on December 21,1990: “No legal bar for registering the case”.

*On January 25,1991,Sampat Singh wrote,“The opinion of new DGP may also be obtained” and submitted the same to the Chief Minister,Hukam Singh.

*The Chief Minister’s Office,on February 27,1991,wrote (a noting signed by LM Jain,the then Personal Secretary to Chief Minister) “CM has seen. He has desired that file be submitted to him along with views of the new DGP within 10 days positively.”

Story continues below this ad

*On March,11,1991,the then Director General of Police RK Hooda,let off Rathore by recommending just departmental action against him.

The systematic assault on Ruchika’s family followed—her brother Ashu,who was falsely implicated in six criminal cases.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement