Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Record shows Natwar’s notice may not hold

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Officials also cited P G Mavalankar’s September 5, 1955 ruling on a similar privilege motion over the publication of the Bank Award Commission Report. The first Speaker of Lok Sabha chose to put the blame on the press/newspaper for non-observance of parliamentary convention. “It was undoubtedly improper for the paper to do so,” he had ruled.

    On March 3, 1956, when notices for an adjournment motion was given on the contention that Budget proposals were allegedly leaked and amounted to breach of privilege, the Speaker, citing House of Commons records, ruled that it need not be referred to the Committee of Privileges.

    Despite this, the UPA government, under pressure from the Opposition, would prefer the notice withdrawn rather than draw the PM into direct confrontation with his former Cabinet colleague.

    Previous12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.