You are here: IE »   Story

Renuka Chowdhury, 54 MoS (Independent Charge) for Women & child Development

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • RenukaChowdhury
    Except some debates and wordy duels, nothing substantive happened.
    Discount UK Shopping
    Renuka Chowdhury, 54 MoS (Independent Charge) for Women & child Development

    Result: -1/10

    She was given independent charge of the Women and Child Development Ministry in 2006 after WCD, earlier under the Human Resource Development Ministry, was made a separate ministry. After three years, there is no marked difference in the condition of women and children in the country.

    Her brief

    In its manifesto in 2004, the Congress said that a nutritious mid-day cooked meal scheme will be introduced in primary and secondary schools across the country and the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) will be universalised to provide for a functional anganwadi in every settlement and full coverage for children below the age of six. Chowdhury was also expected to reduce incidences of maternal and child mortality and malnutrition.

    Ads by Google

    Reforms derailed

    In 1997, judicial guidelines were set on protection against sexual harassment at the workplace, but the “high priority bill” is still shuttling between the National Commission for Women (NCW) and WCD.

    Child labour has not been abolished, apart from a few baby steps taken by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), under the WCD Ministry.

    The demand for additional guaranteed financial support from the expenditure finance committee for the ambitious and controversial proposal to give fortified pre-packaged food—instead of hot cooked meals—to poor children as part of the revamp of the ICDS was trashed by the Planning Commission.

    OPPORTUNITIES BLOWN

    The UPA government dropped attempts to strengthen the anti-Sati law, more than 20 years after it was first enacted. The proposed law was expected to increase prison terms for those committing as well as glorifying the practice.

    After the Nithari incident, Chowdhury stressed on the need for a database of missing children. Till date, the NCPCR is still juggling to get the figures.

    Proposed to the Home Ministry that it grant amnesty to women prisoners. A year after, the issue remains untouched.

    Once talked of taking up the issue of dumped NRI wives but there has hardly been any step forward in the direction.

    State child commissions were supposed to be set up. A Bill was passed in Parliament in 2006, but other than in Delhi and Kerala, the commissions haven’t been set up.

    What was she thinking?

    After the Mangalore pub attack by the Sri Ram Sene, where young women were attacked in an alleged incident of moral policing, she championed the cause of progressive city youth by calling for a “Pub Bharo” campaign and claimed that Mangalore had been “talibanised”.

    High point

    The enforcement of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (2005) in October 2006.

    Low point

    When she said “women must not trust their men” and guard themselves against HIV/AIDS, her statement drew flak from all quarters.

    VIEW FROM THE SHADOW

    “Except some debates and wordy duels, nothing substantive happened. WCD is a very important department.” —Murli Manohar Joshi, former HRD minister in the NDA government

    Did she get your vote?

    She lost in Khammam, Andhra Pradesh, by a margin of 1.24 lakh votes.

    I am happy that Renuka lost !By: Ram Balak | 29-May-2009 Reply | Forward Renuka does not have son hence she does not understand the pain of mothers who lost her son. I am happy that radical feminist like renuka lost election. Ram Balak
    Families destroyerBy: Praveen | 26-May-2009 Reply | Forward I am very very happy that she lost the elections. I used to prey god many times, that she must lost her elections. She is a destroyer of many many families and innocent persons with the laws like DV act. I didn't find any difference between terrorist and the persons who make laws that has no provisions to protect innocent persons from being abused. I didn't still understood Why Indian express thinks DV act as high point. The author will understands it only if he goes through abuse of that law.
    PWDVA was the lowest pointBy: ps | 23-May-2009 Reply | Forward A biased law as PWDVA, 2006 was the lowest point for the WCD ministry and Indian law makers who didn't care to read it. The law is so wide in its ambit and so vaguely worded that unscrupulous lawyers and women are having a field day in the courts. Throwing out old parents (who built their house with their hard earnings) from their own homes. Asking for interim maintenance, sending husbands to jail on cooked up charges is so common.Soli Sorabjee has criticized the law as badly written and yet Indian Express is calling it a high point?Basic empowerment comes from education, health and nutrition. As long as Indian Govt provides that to its children, they don't need such a mockery of laws.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.