Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

RFQ row: Haldea rolls up sleeves to evaluate bids for road projects

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • With several infrastructure projects getting delayed allegedly because of the new request-for-qualification (RFQ) norms that require ministries and departments to shortlist only the top six bidders before calling for financial bids, the Planning Commission has stepped in to demonstrate how tricky issues can be sorted out while awarding contracts in a transparent and speedy fashion.

    “To expedite the evaluation process, it was decided in a recent meeting that the Planning Commission would handle award of five road projects right from the RFQ stage,” said Brahm Dutt, secretary, road transport and highways. Advisor to deputy chairman of Planning Commission, Gajendra Haldea, who helped conceive the new RFQ norms, himself got into the act.

    Between July 12 and July 20, RFQ documents submitted by applicants for 10 projects were evaluated by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and appointed consultants in the presence of Haldea and the director general (road development).

    Ads by Google

    “There were many problems in the evaluation of the RFQ — particularly relating to the format in which documents were to be submitted. For instance, many applicants had not submitted their RFQs in a hard-bound cover which was a pre-requisite.

    Others had provided supporting documents and certificates that had all requisite details but were not as per the format prescribed in the model RFQ and thus, disqualified. The Planning Commission has advised how and when relaxations can be made,” a source present during the evaluation meetings said.

    While the model RFQ is aimed at ensuring that only serious bidders with a proven track record bag projects, most ministries found it cumbersome.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.