Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Right to Education Bill ignoring disabled, pass only after changes: disability activists

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The Right to Education Bill, likely to be passed by Lok Sabha on Monday, is at the centre of a new row with disability activists alleging that it deliberately excludes disabled children from its ambit, in effect denying some 30 million children their right to education.

    These activists, who are accusing Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal of prompting a U-turn in the UPA government’s policy on education for disabled children, want the passage of the Bill to be stalled until it is amended to include provisions for disabled children.

    As proof that the previous UPA government was alive to concerns of disabled children, these activists point to previous HRD minister Arjun Singh’s statement to the Lok Sabha of the government’s commitment to primary education for the disabled. They also refer to the 11th five year plan which stresses on inclusive education for the disabled. Most crucially, they rely on the initial, 2005 draft of the Right to Education Bill which had several specific provisions for disabled children. The current draft has done away with many of these provisions.

    Ads by Google

    Sibal denies any change in government policy. “This government is sensitive to the rights of the disabled,” he told The Indian Express; “the current Bill includes disabled children within its ambit.” Sibal has promised that the Right to Education Act will be his signature reform in the first 100 days of this government. He worries that if the Bill is held up now “it won’t be passed for the next three years.”

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Statement of the minister was an eye-wash and no way helps the disabled childrenBy: SC Vashishth | 31-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward We all know unless things are put in black n white in the statute, no statement even if made in parliament carries any legal value. When this Govt. is not implementing what is existing in PWD Act and UNCRPD, how can we believe that his statement will bring succour to the disabled chilren? It is merely an eyewash and we don't believe in it. We want the law to be amended immediately with proper infrastructure in place to address inclusive education as a reality!regardsSC Vashishth,
    ParentBy: Sathi | 03-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Not only is the present draft bill a violation of right to education of disabled children, it is also a violation of Article 24(2)(a) of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) which the Govt. of India has ratified on October 1, 2007. The article requires that State Parties shall not enact national legislation which in any way vitiates or excludes disabled children from the right to education.
    ShameBy: Mala | 03-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward What a shame!! Why the people with disability have to always fight to show their existence!! Is government blind or what!!
    education bill WRT children with disabilitiesBy: shabnam | 03-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Yes thuis uturn is absolutely unjustified. It is like showing the stars and then dropping off to unde the ground.This is th pattern followed by all govts but from the UPA we expected some more amount of internal communication...very poor show of concern for the country on one of the aspects that will impact the contry in the years to come
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.