Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

RJD launches White Paper offensive with Rly red blots

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Lalu
    Lalu at Parliament on Wednesday. Party sought White Paper on time when Railways was making losses, like under Mamata, Nitish.

    While Lalu Prasad Yadav spent the first day of the Rail Budget debate on the backfoot as doubts were raised about his term in the Railway Ministry, on Wednesday, the RJD came out in full strength to defend its supremo on the floor of the House. The discussion in the Lok Sabha on the Rail Budget went on till after 10 pm, with 131 members participating. Railway Minister Mamata Banerjee is likely to reply on Thursday.

    Questioning Mamata’s decision to bring out a White Paper on Railway performance over the past five years, former Union rural development minister Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said: “What is more white than the Budget papers presented to Parliament? All the previous Railway Budgets were vetted by Parliament, but it (the proposed White Paper) has created confusion. I fail to understand that there is no decision to bring out any kind of White Paper for the period when Railways incurred losses (before Lalu’s tenure), but when Railways have made profit (during Lalu’s tenure) the government finds a need for White Paper. Why?” Singh demanded that there be a White Paper for the period when the Railways suffered losses as well.

    Ads by Google

    His statement was directed against Mamata as well as Lalu’s rival Nitish Kumar, both of whom held the Railways portfolio under the NDA. Nitish’s party JD(U) has been at the forefront accusing Lalu of “accounting jugglery” during his Railway tenure, and had welcomed Mamata’s decision of a White Paper.

    Seconding Lalu’s challenge that a House committee inquire into the allegations against him and submit a report within seven days, Singh said: “It should not take much time to verify the figures of the past five years. It could be done within a matter of days. Therefore any delay in bringing out a White Paper is dangerous.”

    ... contd.

    Next12
    White paper on Lalu's Railway regimeBy: V.Sethumadhavan | 09-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The ministers and M.Ps should remember that they are first the wings of the Government and not politicians only. The members of the house should work in unision for the development of the country for which they have been elected by the citizens of the country and not waste publicmoney and time in a street brawl in the house. Let Mamta first utilise the valuable time and money at her disposal to first ascertain immediate needs of the common man and work for the improvements which are needed immediately. Some examples are overcrowding of trains, bad hygine in the trains and railway stations, corruption, rude behavior of the railway staff, impartial allocation of funds for development of amenities to the states, etc. After she does her job fully,, and if she finds time, let her bring out any number of papers in any number of colours.
    RJD launches White Paper offensive with Rly red blotsBy: darvan | 09-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Runing India Railways like Lalu Prasad did,is a legacy Mamta Banerji and others in the Lok Sabha must take a bow before him. Engineering a non-performing asset to a profitable business doesnot need a harvard degree. He has paved the way for Passenger traffic to ride on the earnings of the Goods traffic, a legacy, Mamta Banerji should capitalise on instead of MPs carping on ulterior motives. A dedicated Goods Corridor North/south is a No.1 priority to the current Lok sabha . Long term plans for Raiway efficiencies in Freight, and then Passenger is priority as important as the defence of India. One should always look at revenues from Freight that subsidise the Passenger. Not implying the the passenger is to be ignored. Ticketting efficiencies,a challenge Mamta Banerji could meet head on, and be glorified next election.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.