RTI activist writes to CJI, Centre on SC judgment
- IPL spot-fixing: Chennai Super Kings owner's kin under police scanner
- IPL 2013 LIVE SCORE: Sunrisers Hyderabad vs Rajasthan Royals
- Jessica Lall murder: Actor Shayan Munshi, ballistic expert Manocha to face perjury trial
- BJP tears into UPA govt on 4th anniversary, says it lacks leadership
- BCCI was forced to encash Pune Warriors' bank guarantee: Sanjay Jagdale
RTI activist Sunil Ahya has written to Chief Justice of India and the Centre that a recent Supreme Court (SC) judgment pertaining to appointment of members and heads of information commissions was inconsistent with the principles laid down in Constitution.
A bench of Justices A K Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar had directed on September 23 that information commissions should work in benches of two, one a "judicial member" and the other an "expert member". It said the state and central chief information commissioners should be retired chief justices of high courts or SC judges.
Justices A K Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar noted RTI Act provided for exclusion of jurisdiction of courts in such matters, but said the extraordinary jurisdiction of Supreme Court and high courts could not be taken away. SC also said orders passed by information commissions "would undoubtedly be subject to judicial review".
Ahya said in a letter dated October 1, "If the said Supreme Court judgment were to be implemented, retired high court and Supreme Court judges would be working for quasi-judicial bodies whose decisions would be subject to scrutiny before sitting judges of high courts and Supreme Court.
"Given the rising popularity of Right to Information Act, 2005, quite a few decisions of information commissions may be subjected to review before judicial courts. This can create an embarrassing situation."
He told Newsline, "The judiciary has several times stressed the point that 'perception of bias' is a factor that needs to be taken note of, even if there might not be evidence of bias in a particular case. This perception of bias would be present if the system laid down by Supreme Court is implemented."
Striking a similar note, Bombay High Court lawyer Ahmed Abdi, said, "I believe the government should go for a review of the order. Unfortunately, this order has crippled the system of Right to Information as serving information commissioners feel they would be in contempt of the SC order if they continue working."
- Fixing probe now reaches Bollywood, son of Dara Singh held
- BCCI cashes Pune Warriors guarantee, 'disgusted' Sahara walks out of IPL
- Sreesanth spent Rs 1.95L on clothes, bought friend BlackBerry, paid in cash: Police
- Delhi firm with MoD as client is linked to Pak cyberattacks
- After Infosys, iGATE sacks Phaneesh Murthy for sexual misconduct
- 2 weeks after harassment, Haryana schoolgirls return, cops in tow