Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

RTI reply reveals huge discrepancies in Modi’s VGGIS figures

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Similarly, for VGGIS 2007, the data released by the CM and the actual data accessed through the RTI Act says 363 MoUs were signed. However, while the chief minister is pegging the committed investments at Rs 4,61,835 crore, the actual figure his government gave out is Rs 4,51,835 crore— a discrepancy of no less than Rs 10,000 crore.

    Again, with regard to commissioned and under implementation investments, the government on Wednesday put this at Rs 2,64,575 crore, indicating a success rate of 57.3 per cent. But figures from the Industries Commissioner show that implemented and under-implementation projects were worth only Rs 1,22,400.66 crore— meaning a success rate of just 27.08 per cent.

    GIDC MD says Modi's figures authentic

    Maheshwar Sahu, Managing Director of the Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC), who made the VGGIS 2009, presentation for the state government on Wednesday with Modi by his side quoting those, said he cannot comprehend the huge discrepancies between the figures.

    Ads by Google

    “I have absolutely no idea why and how the state Industries Commissioner came up with such figures in reply to an RTI application. There must be some catch somewhere. The figures that the chief minister himself announced are authentic. We reiterate that over 60 per cent of the proposed investments during the earlier VGGIS have either been commissioned or are under implementation,” he told this newspaper on Thursday. Sahu added that the issue would be inquired into.

    Previous12
    Hope its not politically motivated!By: Nayan Panchal | 09-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Well it was quite expected at the time of investments itself. As the MoUs received very very huge (i think biggest ever in the history of India), and you obviously won't be able to convert them as actual investments. but anyways, its great to make them realize that what they are claiming is not truth and people should be made aware of the facts. Good job! i would say!
    good article not balanced thoughBy: arjun | 09-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Hey -- good thing that you tried to pull the facts. But you are almost making the poor guy sound like a villian here. Even if we were to accept your numbers -- compare those to west bengal or up or most other state and they are more than impressive. I mean beyond that obviously its your space on the page and your thoughts. Let me know what you think.Regards
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.