Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Sabeer Bhatia’s Nano City faces farmers’ firewall

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • This once sleepy village of Manak Tabra in Haryana has known no peace since 2006. It is right in the middle of the 22 villages between Dangri and Toka rivulets where Sabeer Bhatia has planned his Rs 18.5-billion Nano City.

    Even after two years, the project remains a non-starter with the company failing to buy any land here. A common cause that has brought the 22 villages together under the umbrella of Shivalik Area Kisan Sangharsh Samiti is fighting against land acquisition by the Government (Haryana Infrastructure and Industrial Development Corporation has a 10 per cent sweat equity in the project) or the company.

    The Samiti is headed by 71-year-old Karam Singh from Rurki — a village that’s only a few kilometres away from Manak Tabra and is totally inhabited by Sikh farmers, some of whom have been here for more than 100 years. Known as Masterji among the villagers, Karam Singh and other members of the Samiti fan across the villages at nights whenever there’s a rumour regarding any villager selling his land to the company.

    Ads by Google

    “Even my great grandfather was born here. How can I sell this land? They have plans to build an airport on our lush green agricultural fields. Where will we buy land again if we sell this off? Land prices have shot through the roof everywhere. Prices in the nearby areas have gone up since the announcement of this project as they are expecting us to buy land there once we are dislocated from here,” says Karam Singh who, along with his brother, owns 25 acres of land in Rurki.

    Though Jagpal Singh, who owns some five acres of agricultural land in Manak Tabra, is not a big farmer like Karam Singh, he is content with the money he gets by selling his farm produce and milk. “Though we were initially euphoric, as prices of our land had jumped from Rs 4-5 lakh per acre to Rs 20-25 lakh per acre after Nano City was announced, we are not willing to part with our land now,” he says.

    However, Nanocity Developers Limited director Naval Bhatia, when contacted, said they have finalised the sale deeds and would soon have 500 acres. “The process of buying the required 11,000 acres will take four to five years. We will start from Manak Tabra that is right in the middle of the master plan and extend on both sides gradually. Infrastructure such as roads and educational institutions would be developed first,” he says.

    However, the Samiti asserts that villagers have sold not a single acre to Bhatia so far and no registration of land sale has taken place in the name of the company in the tehsil. “We have been assured by the Chief Minister that there will be no forceful acquisition for Nano City. But if that happens, we will agitate against it. Representatives of some farmer welfare organisations in Delhi had come here to assure us of their support,” says Karam Singh, while denying that the farmers’ unity is aimed at getting a better deal from the company. “Even if the developers offer double of what they are offering — Rs 20-22 lakh per acre — we will not sell our land,” he asserts.

    Because of the uncertainty, the farmers here are making no capital investments — be it deep boring for tubewells or renovation of their homes. “Everyday, there’s a new rumour. We have been even told that the developers have computerised maps of our land holdings,” says one of them.

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.