Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Save tiger: Govt to erase tourism footprint

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • While all tiger reserves have designated ‘tourism zones’, several of these continue to overlap with core tiger areas despite the 2006 Amendment.

    The ultimate aim now is to phase out all tourist activities in core areas, an ambitious task by any standard. In order to keep core tiger areas inviolate, villages — there are hundreds left here — are being moved out, with each adult villager getting a Rs 10-lakh rehabilitation package.

    A Monitoring Committee set up by the NTCA — comprising NTCA member-secretary Rajesh Gopal, Centre for Science and Environment’s Sunita Narain, and environmentalist Samar Singh — will oversee smooth relocation, rehabilitation packages, and also explore the possibility of bringing pro-poor schemes like the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) to rehabilitated villagers.

    Phasing out tourism is the next logical step, says the NTCA. “It is an anomaly to move villages out of core areas, but allow tourism to continue there. We want tourism to be phased out only in core areas but to continue in encircling buffer zones of tiger reserves,” says NTCA member-secretary Rajesh Gopal.

    Ads by Google

    The deaths of tigers, despite strong protection measures, has come under focus again this year, with the big cats losing their lives even in healthy populations. The Indian Express had earlier reported how tigers were being adversely affected by heavy tourism in Corbett Tiger Reserve (Uttarakhand), while Madhya Pradesh, known as the tiger state, lost all its 24 tigers from Panna Tiger Reserve. Neighbouring Kanha, too, lost at least six tigers in the past few months to various causes. Responding to the situation, Secretary, Ministry of Tourism Sujit Banerjee recently called a meeting of officials from Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Maharashtra, to discuss the affects of tourism on tiger reserves.

    Previous12
    tourist is not too badBy: vipul jain | 15-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward it is good that there no sign bord or foundation stone but i feel in in wich area tourist stop tiger condotion r not good and there r more domestic cattle grazing in the jungle than I did wild animals. so 1st try to stop other illigale activite. tourist r friendly
    Will no Tigers left be what it takes for somebody to realise they are more valuable alive than dead!By: Corinne | 22-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I had read recent press articles stating that tourists are to be banned from entering the breeding zones of the tigers and that access will be restricted to outside these areas to ensure that tigers do not become familiar with vehicles, but this is much worse than I thought! I understand the comments about disturbing the tigers natural habitat but leaving the tigers unguarded/unwatched has not helped to sustain their numbers over the last century, in fact the reverse is true. If this is enforced it is very disturbing indeed. On a recent trip to Madhya Pradesh I saw 1st hand evidence in Kitualhi of the effects of no tourists! Our jeep disturbed wood collectors in the so called protected area, they were chased away by the ranger in our vehile! I saw more domestic cattle grazing in the jungle than I did wild animals! If nobody stops this happening the tigers will suffer more not less disturbance until finally a lack of water, habitat and prey leads to no wild tigers! Think again please!
    Finally somebody gets a wake up callBy: zoro19 | 03-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward its long known that tourism has a foot print , except tourism industry is unwilling to recognise that -stubborn as it is. Would have been good if they would have thot of restricitng their activities even in the buffer! The thought that villagers with their smallest footprint can damge tigers but not tourists with their jeeps, noise, eatables and all those tiger shows. damn good move
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.