Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Saying no to the wrong drugs

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The Drugs and Cosmetics Act (DCA) was recently amended to mandate significantly enhanced penalties for those trafficking in “spurious” drugs. While this attempt to counter the menace of harmful drugs is laudable, the term “spurious” itself is loosely worded and could be interpreted to include even legitimately authorised generics. Given recent attempts by multinational pharmaceutical companies to use the ruse of intellectual property enforcement to create additional trade barriers for Indian generic companies, the government needs to be extra vigilant. Particularly so, since such barriers are also likely to impact the availability of affordable medicines to ailing patient populations.

    Section 17 (b) (b) of the Drug and Cosmetics Act defines spurious drugs thus: “a drug shall be deemed to be spurious if it is an intimation of, or is a substitute for, another drug or resembles another drug in a manner likely to deceive or bear upon it or upon its label or container the name of another drug unless it is plainly and conspicuously marked so as to reveal its true character and its lack of identity with such other drug.”

    Ads by Google

    Based on the above definition, Bayer, a German multinational patentee, dragged Cipla and the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) to court, arguing that Cipla’s generic version of Bayer’s patented anti-cancer drug was likely to qualify as “spurious” and therefore ought not be granted drug regulatory approval.

    Bayer’s preposterous legal attack drew some sustenance from section 17B of the DCA which begins by stating that “a drug shall be deemed to be spurious if it is an intimation of, or is a substitute for, another drug”. Most generics are indeed imitations or substitutes of the original drug! But imitation by itself is not a problem, unless the law states so. And given India’s unique tryst with a patent regime that actively encouraged such copying from the 1970’s and led to the growth of a world-class generic industry that now provides affordable access to a large part of the world, the government, far from enjoining such imitation, must actively promote it.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    The true 'spurious' drugs !By: Kishore Karnad | 24-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Basheer has brought up a very valid point by highlighting defective section in the Act. The intention should be to nab those who produce 'duplicate' drugs containing little or no active ingredient as claimed and try to pass these off as the 'original' thus depriving consumers of the expected relief and his hard earned money. The section does no attempt to detect and catch such culprits and instead punishes those who strieve to provide affordable substitutes made to the highest standards rendering relief to ailing masses across the globe. This sad for India's phrma industry as well as patients. What we need is honest inplementation of existing laws; speedy prosecution, and strict conviction of culprits running what is claimed to be a 1600 crore 'industry' dumping substandard imitations carrying lables of and priced at 'originals',thus depriving patients of relief and money. A phrma industry run task force may help to do this.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.