Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

SC asks states to explain delay in implementing NREGS

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The Supreme Court on Thursday asked all states and the Centre to furnish replies with regard to allegations about the tardy implementation of the UPA Government’s flagship National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme.

    The directive came on a petition filed by an NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security (CEFS), which highlighted that most funds allocated under the scheme “do not reach the intended recipients, are are instead siphoned off by the corrupt officials and contractors”.

    The petition is based on the draft CAG report besides the NGO’s own survey. The Indian Express, too, had highlighted the same in a series of reports earlier this year.

    Acting on the submissions of advocate Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for the NGO, Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan issued a notice to the Ministry of Rural Development besides chief secretaries of all states. Urging the court to make the authorities concerned accountable for non-implementation of the Act, the advocate pleaded that the court issue directions for fixing liability on the chief secretary or the district collector.

    Ads by Google

    Alleging that the scheme, which was notified in September 2005 with a view to provide 100 days of minimum guaranteed employment to at least one member of each rural household, is riddled with corruption and mismanagement, the NGO has sought “proper and equitable implementation of the Act and schemes envisaged under it”.

    The first reality check for the scheme had come after a six-month performance audit conducted under the CAG across 68 randomly selected districts. The report had concluded that barely 3.2 pc of the registered households could avail 100 days of employment in a year.

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.