The Supreme Court on Thursday said that it would ask the Centre to explain if it had allegedly breached the terms of environmental clearance received in 1989 for Kudankulam nuclear plant in Tamil Nadu and hence,it now required to procure a fresh licence in view of the changes made in the original plan.
On being told that initial proposals relating to storage of spent fuel,consumption of water for the plant,ceiling on increase in temperature of the sea-level had been altered since procuring the clearance in 1989,a Bench,led by Justice K S Radhakrishnan,said the court will seek answers from the Centre on all these contentions. We will ask them all the questions. The primary concern of the court is safety. If you are saying there are violations on so many ground,we will ask them to explain, the Bench told Prashant Bhushan,who appeared for the petitioners.
The plant had received a vague environmental clearance in 1989 from the MoEF with meaningless conditions,except that the change in sea temperature must not exceed 5 degree celsius since it affects marine life. But the only categorical condition regarding the temperature change has been unilaterally changed by the plant operator to a 40 per cent higher figure,7 degrees celsius. Violation of an essential condition would ipso facto make the 1989 clearance void, said advocate Bhushan.
The court will hear the matter on Thursday.
Protesters invite Mamata to village
Desperately in search of mass leaders who can back their struggle against the Kudankulam plant,the Peoples Movement Against Nuclear Energy has written a letter to Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee,inviting her to visit Idinthakarai,the protest epicentre. The letter noted her stand against Haripur nuclear project in Bengal.