The court, perusing his arguments, appeared convinced that the concerned environmental authority under the statute did not consider the impact of Tsunami, which struck in 2004, or any future possibility of the natural disaster in its EIA report furnished prior to the grant of clearance in 2005.
The arguments would continue on Thursday.
The Centre said it would put forward its stand only when its turn comes for the arguments.
Epaper
Newsletter
Stocks
Weather
Horoscope
