Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

SC refuses to review Babri order

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Finding nothing wrong in the decision of shifting the trial pending against L K Advani and several other senior BJP and VHP leaders in the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition case from a special court of Rae Bareli to Lucknow, the Supreme Court today refused to review it.

    A Bench headed by CJI K G Balakrishnan dismissed a petition and applications seeking review of its verdict allowing trial of cases before two separate courts at Rae Bareli and Lucknow. “We are of the opinion that the earlier order passed by this court dismissing the Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) does not require any reconsideration,” the Bench, also comprising Justices G P Mathur and R V Raveendran, said in a much awaited judgment. It was reserved on August 29 2006.

    “There is no error apparent on the face of the record nor do the facts and circumstances warrant any interference with our earlier order,” Justice Balakrishnan said.

    Ads by Google

    The Bench said the petitions seeking review of its November 29, 2002 order by which it had upheld the validity of the notification issued by the UP Government on September 28, 2002 for holding the trial of the cases at two different places “are without any merit and dismissed accordingly”.

    The Rae Bareli court is holding trial against eight prominent accused, including senior BJP leaders L K Advani, M M Joshi and Vinay Katiyar, expelled BJP leader Uma Bharati, VHP leaders Ashok Singhal, Vishnu Hari Dalmiya, Giriraj Kishore and Sadhwi Rithambhara.

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.