SC refuses to stay recovery of Vedanta entry tax dues
- India to convey concerns over Ladakh incursion to Chinese Premier
- IPL spot-fixing case: Delhi Police to trace money trail in four cities
- IPL 2013 LIVE SCORE: Mumbai Indians bowl, Sachin Tendulkar misses out
- Rajapaksa slams Tamil diaspora for lack of support in reconciliation process
- 5 differently abled orphan girls beaten, raped in Jaipur residential school
In a setback to Vedanta Aluminium (VAL), the Supreme Court has refused to stay recovery of the Anil Agarwal group firm's entry tax dues of around R130 crore on goods imported for its alumina refinery and smelter plant in Orissa between 2008 and 2012.
A bench headed by Justice RM Lodha refused to stay the Orissa High Court order that upheld the state's decision to tax the import of capital goods under the provisions of the Orissa Entry Tax, 1999. "There cannot be blanket ban on recovery," the apex court said while posting the matter for hearing on October 29.
VAL senior counsel CA Sundaram, wants interim protection, argued the apex court had already stayed such recovery in another case of Sterlite Energy.
Challenging imposition of entry tax on imported goods in Orissa, VAL said that goods imported from outside India could not be exigible for entry tax which a dealer is liable to pay on the event of entry of goods into a local area for use, consumption or sale.
VAL, which is setting up an alumina refinery at Lanjigarh (Kalahandi district) and an aluminium smelter plant in Jharsuhuda with captive power plants in the state, had been procuring capital goods comprising plant, machinery and equipment from domestic manufacturers. Besides, it also imports such goods from the US, Canada, Germany, China, Australia, Italy, France, South Africa and Spain.
VAL, a subsidiary of the London Stock Exchange listed-Vedanta Resources Plc, said that it had been paying tax on goods, procured from domestic manufacturers, brought into the state. Till July 2007, it had paid around R17 crore towards entry tax on goods procured indigeneously and more than R20 crore on the imported goods.
While the company claimed that it was advised against paying entry tax on imported goods, it had moved the HC apprehending that the revenue authorities might resort to other penal action.
- Destitute, orphan students outclass rest in Andhra Class 10 exams
- To re-energise ties, PM wants to visit US, waits for confirmation
- NIA court says no terror link, frees 'Hizbul militant' Liyaqat on bail
- CBI arrests its coal allotments investigator on bribery charge
- ‘Cricketer-bookie Amit may have used Jiju to reach Sree’
- BCCI chief N Srinivasan says police must prove spot-fixing allegations