Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

SC rejects Maya's plea on statues row

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Mayawati
    Mayawati govt had filed an urgent application seeking permission to go-ahead with the maintenance work at Ambedkar site.

    The Supreme Court on Friday rejected the plea of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati for permission to undertake maintenance and certain other works at the controversial Rs 2,600 crores Ambedkar site in Lucknow.

    A bench of Justices H S Bedi and J M Panchal felt that there was "no change of circumstances" to grant any such relief to the state government which was earlier restrained by it from carrying out any further activities at the site.

    The apex court, however, said it would examine the plea on merits when the main matter relating to the issue would come up on November 30.

    The state government had filed an urgent application seeking permission to go-ahead with the maintenance work on the plea that lakhs of people would be thronging the site on December 6 on the occasion of the birth anniversary of B R Ambedkar.

    Senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar Singh and Gomti Nagar Sanstha, opposed any such relief on the ground that the state government cannot be trusted as it had earlier violated the undertaking given by it to the Supreme Court that there would be no construction activities.

    Ads by Google

    The apex court had earlier by three separate orders restrained all construction and maintenance activities at the site where scores of memorials and statues of various dalit icons and Mayawati were being made.

    fools are worryingBy: u p anil | 18-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward our innocent fools disguised as intellectuals are dare to hear an amount of 3000 crore for installing statues by mayawati. What they will do when they realise the fact that congress had spent 300000 crores for statues all over india. fools are always fools.
    MayavatiBy: Atis | 14-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Luxurious lavatories should be built in the premises for the people
    citizenBy: johna | 14-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward 2,600 crores...?Is this womean sick or not??she should be made responsible for misuse or power and funds. Tried as a criminal and punished to the maximum extent of the law?we need to wake up,before it is too late..please..Illeterate can lead the blind..Let the young generation wake up and kick the selfish politicians out and change something for better.Otherwise we will have nothing left to talk about.
    citizenBy: johna | 14-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward The untouchables...Politicians got thick skin with no shame to misuse and profit for personal gain. Who give a damn that she is creating statues for herself and others?She is not paying for it.The taxpayers - only the working poor - not rich people.She is not the only one - majority of the so called politicians have the same attitude to loot the treasury for their own purpose and their goondas,who brought such people to "power" - useless. India need to have the young generation wake up-kick all the old selfish politicians out and create some kind of law and order with some respect for the common people.Talk is cheap..Wake up and smell the coffee...
    Court should stop her.By: DR.PETROL PUMP CHOR | 13-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward I believe this women has no right to misuse the tax payers money by building statues of her own. She is already involved in the Taj corridor case.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.