




The bench brushed aside the claims of the state and the DMK that what was essentially intended was a public meeting.
“Where is the public meeting? You show us. Your resolution say it is cessation of all activities and work. You want to show your popularity. Why do you want to close all educational institutions and commercial activities? Where will you then find people for your meetings?” the bench said.
“Your protest is against whom? The project, Central Government or against this court?” the bench asked to which the counsel claimed that the protest was for seeking early implementation of the project.
The bench said it was mainly concerned with the issue of deciding whether a bandh call can be given by any individual or organisation, after the concept of bandh had been declared illegal and unconstitutional by the apex court.
According to the bench, a bandh call essentially paralysed public life and was violative of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 19 (Freedom of Speech) and Article 21 (Right To Liberty) of the Constitution.
...


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications