Amba Salelkar

For all our children


Amba Salelkar

SC to hear two SLPs on Singur together

Ads by Google

The Supreme Court today said it would simultaneously hear two special leave petitions (SPL) on the issue of land acquisition in Singur.

The state government had approached the Supreme Court to hear two SLPs at the same time as both were related. The two-judge bench of Justice H L Dattu and Justice Chandramauli Prasad today said the court would hear the arguments together.

In 2006, several public interest litigations were moved in the Calcutta High Court challenging the land acquisition process at Singur for the Tata Nano plant but the high court had rejected all the petitions. Following that, the petitioners had approached the apex court challenging the order of the high court. The case came up for hearing today.

Advocate Avijit Sengupta, counsel of the state government, said the state urged the Supreme Court to hear the case along with the SLP on the Singur Act. The Supreme Court granted the plea of the state government, said Sengupta.

The new government introduced the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act in June last year to take over the possession of the land from Tata Motors. In June, the Calcutta High Court had held that the Singur Act was unconstitutional, hearing the petition filed by Tata Motors. The state government then moved the Supreme Court challenging the verdict. According to today's order, both the cases will be heard together.

Ads by Google
Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus